Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AnnaLee

(1,252 posts)
8. I'm not sure this would be more than a set back
Sun Mar 30, 2025, 09:53 AM
Mar 30

I'm more asking a question than saying the following is indeed allowed.

Couldn't Trump just have any department head (such as Defense, Treasury, etc.) fire some high personnel in a small agency and replace them with DOGE employees as governement employees. Then the agency could be renamed (name changes happen all the time). Also, I don't think Presidential staff appointments are all subject to Congressional approval. If not, another way to get them actually on the payroll. If these are possible, I would hope they would be subject to security clearance proceedures (but I doubt the current crowd do serious clearance checks). Do they even need to be organized into an agency to do the same damage?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN: Is DOGE actually an ...»Reply #8