General Discussion

" - you are admitting you are breaking the law."
No. Sorry. As chunky and wonderful as this might be as rhetoric - it just simply isn't the case in today's law enforcement. Now you can argue whether you think that is right or not. But, as a declarative statement - it is simple false.

"Just because you have a vest that says ICE on the back and you are dressed in black doesn’t mean you work for the federal government or any law enforcement agency."
While not outside the realm of any possibility .... It remains extremely unlikely. There are fairly stringent laws involving 'impersonation' - not to mention the fact the agencies themselves tend to get very pissy about it. (on the rare occasion that someone is stupid enough .. ) Also - and very importantly - if you chose to 'react' to uniforms attempting to apprehend, as if it were 'kidnapping and assault', there's a very strong chance that you will end up with injury .. additional charges .. bail refusal .. and on down the line. None of it good, none of it bearing any advantage to you. You are not going to repel or reverse the apprehension or arrest - and the almost inevitable result is that you will make things much worse - both for yourself and for anyone that might be trying to intervene and assist ....

Summing up ... The assumption that an apprehension is 'unlawful' and a 'kidnapping/assault' - is in every likelihood faulty on its face - and, additionally, will almost certainly end up in adverse (and perhaps extremely adverse) consequence. In short - it's a very dumb idea.

And there you have a little more fleshed out version on why I entered an initial objection to the OP. The basic premise backing it serves almost no purpose - and if followed, is likely to get people hurt ...