Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Mark Elias: 🚨BREAKING: Federal court rules that the Pennsylvania date requirement for mail-in ballot violates the First [View all]
and 14th Amendments. Counties cannot reject ballots from counting undated and wrongly dated mail-in ballots.A HUGE victory for my law firm, our clients DSCC and DCCC and the voters of PA!
https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-undated-and-wrongly-dated-mail-in-ballots-challenge-eakin/
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3llozc4udes2p
https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-undated-and-wrongly-dated-mail-in-ballots-challenge-eakin/
Pennsylvania Undated and Wrongly Dated Mail-in Ballots Challenge (Eakin)
Eakin v. Adams County Board of Elections
Filed: November 7, 2022
Decided: March 31, 2025
Lawsuit filed by three Pennsylvania voters, Fetterman for PA (the U.S. Senate campaign for John Fetterman (D), the state’s current lieutenant governor), the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) against Pennsylvania’s 67 county boards of elections challenging the “Date Instruction,” for mail-in ballots. In Pennsylvania, there’s a slight distinction between absentee and mail-in ballots, but we will use “mail-in ballots” to refer to both types of ballots. The Date Instruction prevents counties from counting undated mail-in ballots (ballots that are timely cast and valid but missing a date on their outer return envelopes) and wrongly dated mail-in ballots (ballots that are timely cast and valid but have an incorrect date, such as the voter’s birthday, on their outer return envelopes).
-snip-
The plaintiffs also allege that not counting undated or wrongly dated mail-in ballots violates the First and 14th Amendments by placing an undue burden on the right to vote. The plaintiffs request that the court declare the Date Instruction and “any other provision that requires voters to provide (correct) dates on their mailing envelope—or precludes election officials from counting ballots that lack such dates” in violation of the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act and First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs request that the defendants be prohibited from rejecting absentee and mail-in ballots that do not comply with the Date Instruction.
RESULT: On March 31, 2025 the court found that the state’s date requirement for mail-in ballot violates the First and 14th Amendments. Counties cannot reject ballots from counting undated and wrongly dated mail-in ballots.
Eakin v. Adams County Board of Elections
Filed: November 7, 2022
Decided: March 31, 2025
Lawsuit filed by three Pennsylvania voters, Fetterman for PA (the U.S. Senate campaign for John Fetterman (D), the state’s current lieutenant governor), the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) against Pennsylvania’s 67 county boards of elections challenging the “Date Instruction,” for mail-in ballots. In Pennsylvania, there’s a slight distinction between absentee and mail-in ballots, but we will use “mail-in ballots” to refer to both types of ballots. The Date Instruction prevents counties from counting undated mail-in ballots (ballots that are timely cast and valid but missing a date on their outer return envelopes) and wrongly dated mail-in ballots (ballots that are timely cast and valid but have an incorrect date, such as the voter’s birthday, on their outer return envelopes).
-snip-
The plaintiffs also allege that not counting undated or wrongly dated mail-in ballots violates the First and 14th Amendments by placing an undue burden on the right to vote. The plaintiffs request that the court declare the Date Instruction and “any other provision that requires voters to provide (correct) dates on their mailing envelope—or precludes election officials from counting ballots that lack such dates” in violation of the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act and First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs request that the defendants be prohibited from rejecting absentee and mail-in ballots that do not comply with the Date Instruction.
RESULT: On March 31, 2025 the court found that the state’s date requirement for mail-in ballot violates the First and 14th Amendments. Counties cannot reject ballots from counting undated and wrongly dated mail-in ballots.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Mark Elias: 🚨BREAKING: Federal court rules that the Pennsylvania date requirement for mail-in ballot violates the First [View all]
highplainsdem
Mar 31
OP
Elias And His Cohorts Are Fighting The Fight That ALL The Law Firms Ought To Be Fighting!
MayReasonRule
Mar 31
#2
When this is over, and we still have voting rights, Marc Elias will be the hero.
lindysalsagal
Mar 31
#7
I've been in a line at CA post office to post a tax return. Line so long and unwieldy that the workers wouldn't know
iluvtennis
Mar 31
#23
Yes, they postmarked it for the deadline. Wasn't our fault that the drop off line of cars went for a mile. Even though
iluvtennis
Apr 1
#51
"Line so long and unwieldy that the workers wouldn't know what time you got in line"
MichMan
Apr 1
#55
I don't think there's a right and wrong on this issue, as both sides think they're right
Polybius
Mar 31
#43
This is probably the millionth (exaggerated) case regarding our mail ballots and the dates
BumRushDaShow
Mar 31
#21
45 recently started telling his minions to "vote early" and use those mail ballots
BumRushDaShow
Mar 31
#34
HEAR, HEAR!!! Fraudulent Mail In Ballots Are About As Prevalent As Angels Dancing On Heads Of Pins
MayReasonRule
Apr 1
#48
Precisely right! It serves NO valid purpose as courts have repeatedly recognized.
benfranklin1776
Mar 31
#33
There are also other groups in PA that vote Democratic that aren't majority college educated
Polybius
Mar 31
#44