Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

highplainsdem

(55,294 posts)
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 03:10 PM Mar 31

Mark Elias: 🚨BREAKING: Federal court rules that the Pennsylvania date requirement for mail-in ballot violates the First [View all]

and 14th Amendments. Counties cannot reject ballots from counting undated and wrongly dated mail-in ballots.

A HUGE victory for my law firm, our clients DSCC and DCCC and the voters of PA!

https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-undated-and-wrongly-dated-mail-in-ballots-challenge-eakin/



https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3llozc4udes2p


https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-undated-and-wrongly-dated-mail-in-ballots-challenge-eakin/

Pennsylvania Undated and Wrongly Dated Mail-in Ballots Challenge (Eakin)
Eakin v. Adams County Board of Elections

Filed: November 7, 2022

Decided: March 31, 2025

Lawsuit filed by three Pennsylvania voters, Fetterman for PA (the U.S. Senate campaign for John Fetterman (D), the state’s current lieutenant governor), the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) against Pennsylvania’s 67 county boards of elections challenging the “Date Instruction,” for mail-in ballots. In Pennsylvania, there’s a slight distinction between absentee and mail-in ballots, but we will use “mail-in ballots” to refer to both types of ballots. The Date Instruction prevents counties from counting undated mail-in ballots (ballots that are timely cast and valid but missing a date on their outer return envelopes) and wrongly dated mail-in ballots (ballots that are timely cast and valid but have an incorrect date, such as the voter’s birthday, on their outer return envelopes).

-snip-

The plaintiffs also allege that not counting undated or wrongly dated mail-in ballots violates the First and 14th Amendments by placing an undue burden on the right to vote. The plaintiffs request that the court declare the Date Instruction and “any other provision that requires voters to provide (correct) dates on their mailing envelope—or precludes election officials from counting ballots that lack such dates” in violation of the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act and First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs request that the defendants be prohibited from rejecting absentee and mail-in ballots that do not comply with the Date Instruction.

RESULT: On March 31, 2025 the court found that the state’s date requirement for mail-in ballot violates the First and 14th Amendments. Counties cannot reject ballots from counting undated and wrongly dated mail-in ballots.
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
knr UTUSN Mar 31 #1
Elias And His Cohorts Are Fighting The Fight That ALL The Law Firms Ought To Be Fighting! MayReasonRule Mar 31 #2
Exactly !! This is how it's done. C_U_L8R Mar 31 #5
K & R malaise Mar 31 #3
We should celebrate every win peggysue2 Mar 31 #4
Thanks for the all too rare good news. K&R Ping Tung Mar 31 #6
When this is over, and we still have voting rights, Marc Elias will be the hero. lindysalsagal Mar 31 #7
Kick SheltieLover Mar 31 #8
GEAT NEWS here. I'm gonna celebrate by bluestarone Mar 31 #9
Marc Elias is heroic Quiet Em Mar 31 #10
He IS a hero! A hero not just for us, but for DEMOCRACY. calimary Mar 31 #11
Fantastic news!! Thanks for posting, highplainsdem. wordstroken Mar 31 #12
ding ding ding ding. AllaN01Bear Mar 31 #13
If I had living heroes, Marc Elias would top the list. LoisB Mar 31 #14
Fantabulous!!!!!!!! pandr32 Mar 31 #15
This means it cannot be over-ruled by the PA state courts, am I right? FakeNoose Mar 31 #16
Or by SCOTUS because it's a state issue, I'm guessing (IANAL). TheRickles Mar 31 #20
The state Supreme Court agreed in January to review again BumRushDaShow Mar 31 #22
Thank you, Marc Elias, from PA! Alice B. Mar 31 #17
GOOD!!!!! ShazzieB Mar 31 #18
Same with requiring a signature MichMan Mar 31 #27
I believe that the ballots should be postmarked, just like our tax forms ... aggiesal Mar 31 #19
I've been in a line at CA post office to post a tax return. Line so long and unwieldy that the workers wouldn't know iluvtennis Mar 31 #23
They did the same thing here in San Diego, except ... aggiesal Mar 31 #29
San Diego more controls that San Jose - good stuff. n/t iluvtennis Mar 31 #30
What validity does a postmark have it is added after a deadline ? MichMan Apr 1 #46
Yes, they postmarked it for the deadline. Wasn't our fault that the drop off line of cars went for a mile. Even though iluvtennis Apr 1 #51
"Line so long and unwieldy that the workers wouldn't know what time you got in line" MichMan Apr 1 #55
I don't think there's a right and wrong on this issue, as both sides think they're right Polybius Mar 31 #43
I do think there is a right and wrong ... aggiesal Apr 1 #50
This is probably the millionth (exaggerated) case regarding our mail ballots and the dates BumRushDaShow Mar 31 #21
Yes thanks for the review, the Repukes just wouldn't let it die FakeNoose Mar 31 #24
45 recently started telling his minions to "vote early" and use those mail ballots BumRushDaShow Mar 31 #34
It actually may have made some difference in November's elections Wiz Imp Mar 31 #35
There was an uptick of mail ballots in red areas in PA BumRushDaShow Apr 1 #47
HEAR, HEAR!!! Fraudulent Mail In Ballots Are About As Prevalent As Angels Dancing On Heads Of Pins MayReasonRule Apr 1 #48
K&R! gademocrat7 Mar 31 #25
Great work folks, unfortunately Eliot Rosewater Mar 31 #26
Nope. Case was 100% about PA state law. SCOTUS has no jurisdiction. Wiz Imp Mar 31 #36
Why was it in a Federal US District court? MichMan Mar 31 #40
Sorry, I thought this was a state Supreme Court Decision Wiz Imp Mar 31 #45
Doesn't that favor Republicans? MichMan Mar 31 #28
I'm sure Elias has considered the demographic aspects of it cadoman Mar 31 #31
It shouldn't matter. RandomNumbers Mar 31 #32
Precisely right! It serves NO valid purpose as courts have repeatedly recognized. benfranklin1776 Mar 31 #33
This is not an issue for most here. BidenRocks Mar 31 #41
Yes I remember the 2004 election very painfully. benfranklin1776 Apr 1 #49
Changing voting rules brakester Apr 1 #53
It favors Democracy Wiz Imp Mar 31 #37
The USPS will not aid Chump in suppressing the vote FakeNoose Mar 31 #39
There are also other groups in PA that vote Democratic that aren't majority college educated Polybius Mar 31 #44
Would this ruling have made any difference in any past elections? Wiz Imp Mar 31 #38
I know that the decision is popular, but saying it violates the 1st Amendment is a bit of a stretch Polybius Mar 31 #42
Thank you Mark Elias! Janbdwl72 Apr 1 #52
A needless requirement by Republicans who want to diminish the vote. Grins Apr 1 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mark Elias: 🚨BREA...