Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

exboyfil

(18,346 posts)

5. It could be that containerization can be so optimized

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Wed Apr 2, 2025, 03:44 PM

Apr 2025

That rail and on and off ship makes more sense than floating large ships through the canal. I haven't followed it, but now it sounds like we have two rail options (Panama and Mexico).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wednesdays wolfie001

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Denmark's Maersk buys Panama Canal railway [View all] demmiblue Apr 2025 OP

Mexico is on it too................... Lovie777 Apr 2025 #1

Well that's going to twist some already too tight "whities" (diapers)... hlthe2b Apr 2025 #2

Hoo boy! WestMichRad Apr 2025 #3

Norway is the wealthiest country KT2000 Apr 2025 #4

It could be that containerization can be so optimized exboyfil Apr 2025 #5

Good move. More of this, please. wnylib Apr 2025 #6

Its enough to drive Trump off the rails.... Historic NY Apr 2025 #7

Same... catchnrelease Apr 2025 #11

Denmark again. ha ha. riversedge Apr 2025 #8

Sounds like a bargaining chip to protect Greenland newdeal2 Apr 2025 #9

photo...... riversedge Apr 2025 #10

So that is what a Danish middle finger looks like! HAB911 Apr 2025 #12

Heh! Now trump is going to build a train line Greenland.. madinmaryland Apr 2025 #13