Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(53,439 posts)
51. Members of the anti-progressive crew really come out hard against AOC in the 2020 NY-14 Democratic primary, where they
Wed Apr 16, 2025, 09:43 PM
Apr 2025

went all in (with some predicting AOC would be crushed) for the anti-progressive, centrist Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, who was a long time Republican before switching parties, lived in a likely $18-20K per month (its was $15K per month in 2011) flat in the Trump International Hotel and Tower on Columbus Circle in Manhattan before she moved into the 14th district (to Sunnyside, Queens) in 2019, was backed by the RW US Chamber of Commerce, and was heavily supported by major Wall Street donors.

Caruso-Cabrera also (at least as late as October 2018) was still flogging her RW book You Know I'm Right: More Prosperity, Less Government, in which she was calling for eliminating the Departments of Labor, Commerce, Education, and also was calling for privatising Social Security.

receipts:

Michelle Caruso-Cabrera was pushing her RW book at least up until October 2018.




CNBC's Caruso-Cabrera: Eliminate Departments Of Labor, Commerce, Education And Privatize Social Security

https://crooksandliars.com/heather/cnbcs-caruso-cabrera-eliminate-departments

CNBC anchor Michelle Caruso-Cabrera visited the set of Morning Joe to push her new book You Know I'm Right and apparently we've got another Ayn Rand fan working for CNBC. After saying that the auto companies should have been allowed to fail, presumably to get rid of those pesky over paid union workers, Mike Barnicle asks her if she thinks we're going to have to raise taxes to pay our deficit. Cabrera of course doesn't think we should raise taxes and says that instead we should cut spending. Leslie Stahl asks her where. She replies:




snip





Wall Street takes aim at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in party primary

https://www.ft.com/content/580b5830-7f7e-4092-a6f7-7b451e075e10

snip

Ms Caruso-Cabrera, 53, has raised just over $2m, a substantial figure for a challenger, as dozens of chief executives, investors, bankers and lawyers have given the maximum allowable donation of $2,800 each to her primary campaign. Some have given another $2,800 for the general election.

However, Ms Ocasio-Cortez has taken in even more: $10.5m, reflecting the ability of figures on the party’s leftwing — such as Bernie Sanders, her preferred presidential candidate — to attract hundreds of thousands of small donations from contributors nationwide. The median size of her donations is $10, according to an Financial Times analysis of Federal Election Commission filings and the online fundraising platform ActBlue.



While many of Ms Caruso-Cabrera’s supporters raise money for Democrats, several are prominent business backers of President Donald Trump including Ken Langone, the billionaire founder of retailer Home Depot, activist investor Nelson Peltz and John Catsimatidis, who founded the Gristedes grocery chain. 

Larry Lindsey, a Republican economist who served in the George W Bush administration, said: “Michelle knows more about the world and how things work than probably a solid majority of Congress.” He said he had known the challenger for 15 years and wrote her campaign a cheque as soon as he learnt she was running. “She and I would consider ourselves pragmatic libertarians.” 


snip

AOC Attacked by Super PAC Funded by Primary Opponent's Husband

Mailers and digital media opposing Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are being distributed by a super PAC that has received the majority of its funding from Stephen Dizard, the husband of her primary opponent, Michelle Caruso-Cabrera.

https://readsludge.com/2020/06/17/aoc-attacked-by-super-pac-funded-by-primary-opponents-husband/

Congressional candidates and the PACs that donate to them can only legally take a few thousand dollars from individual donors. But PACs that tell the Federal Election Commission that they won’t donate to or coordinate with candidates are allowed to take unlimited amounts of money from donors.

Since the contribution limits for outside spending groups were eliminated by a 2010 D.C. Circuit court ruling that came in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, many PACs have tested the limits of how closely they can affiliate with candidates without being considered to be acting in coordination and, thus, no longer allowed to raise unlimited sums from donors. Now, the latest attempt to push the limits has emerged in the race between Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and her Democratic primary challenger, former CNBC correspondent Michelle Caruso-Cabrera.

An organization called Fight for Our Communities PAC reported its first expenditure to the FEC on Tuesday—$28,000 paid to a Pittsburgh video production company called Phenomenon Post for digital media and mailers opposing Ocasio-Cortez. The mailers and digital media were publicly distributed on Tuesday, according to the FEC filing. As of its most recent disclosure covering receipts made prior to April 30, Fight for Our Communities PAC is funded primarily by Caruso-Cabrera’s husband, Stephen Dizard, who donated $30,000 to it in April. Dizard’s donations make up more than 70% of the PAC’s total funding, according to FEC records, and it is more than ten times the amount he would be allowed to give to the Caruso-Cabrera campaign. Fight for Our Communities is required to file an updated donor disclosure on June 20.

Next to nothing is known about who is behind Fight for Our Communities PAC. The organization was formed in Delaware on March 18, less than a month after Caruso-Cabrera entered the race. Its treasurer, an unknown individual named John Gorman, does not appear to have ever worked with other political committees. The group has no public profile and no internet presence, and it has not made expenditures in any other races. Sludge asked the Caruso-Cabrera campaign if it knew how her husband was aware of the group to make his donation, but was told by a spokesperson that it had “no information” on the matter. The Caruso-Cabrera has sent multiple mailers attacking Ocasio-Cortez and is currently running attack ads in New York City.



snip

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Never liked him nini Apr 2025 #1
I was glad to see a younger person elected to DNC leadership mcar Apr 2025 #2
It's more constructive to contact David Hogg and tell him exactly what you're saying here. He's young. He'll listen. ancianita Apr 2025 #47
The young never listen krawhitham Apr 2025 #95
He's an individual, not the faceless "young" & we won't know until we try. He may have been listening to... Hekate Apr 2025 #106
Well said, mcar... Cha Apr 2025 #78
I worked Bobby Kennedy's campaign when I was 11 nini Apr 2025 #99
That must have been an amazing experience! mcar Apr 2025 #103
It was a learning experience and I am still heartbroken how it ended nini Apr 2025 #114
I said he was not a good choice for vice chair Meowmee Apr 2025 #16
He was a great choice. I fully support his trying to bring in new persepectives to safe Blue seats. Celerity Apr 2025 #28
No seat is a "safe Blue seat" with Mango Mussolini in charge. Trumpistas have money to burn... Hekate Apr 2025 #108
The status quo & 'doff the cap to ANY and ALL incumbents, no matter what' stances have been a disaster, and have helped Celerity Apr 2025 #113
It is hard to have hope these days when so many people can't see through these narcissists nini Apr 2025 #115
The dnc has to take care of this but my guess is they won't Meowmee Apr 2025 #118
He was just on MSNBC, and again set the record straight. He is NOT going after any Democrats in any remotely vulnerable Celerity Apr 2025 #3
Hogg is young and idealistic SocialDemocrat61 Apr 2025 #6
I agree. We win on the issues. mjvpi Apr 2025 #24
I heard the interview. TomSlick Apr 2025 #8
Red herring. He is not going after any Dems in vulnerable seats. And as was pointed out in the interview, other DNC Celerity Apr 2025 #13
The DNC ought not take sides in primary elections. TomSlick Apr 2025 #17
I disagree and fully support Hogg's attempt to try to bring in new thoughts and perspectives via a democratic (small d) Celerity Apr 2025 #20
Imagine that! Democrats who disagree with each other. TomSlick Apr 2025 #22
Hogg has and will be supporting Democrats, and some of those Dems will be challenging other Dems in a Democratic primary Celerity Apr 2025 #29
I hope it all works out and no "safe" Democratic seats are lost. TomSlick Apr 2025 #45
Where will they throw their support? To Republicans or sit it out? Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #53
Democrats can always be expected to attack each other. TomSlick Apr 2025 #56
I don't think you are correct on that. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #59
You are correct. We shall see. TomSlick Apr 2025 #61
I totally agree with you. The tired "new perspectives" translates Nixie Apr 2025 #76
Then tell him exactly what you're saying here. Do it. Don't just criticize. ancianita Apr 2025 #48
I'm sorry. I misunderstood. TomSlick Apr 2025 #66
I'm giving you, TomSlick, some constructive discussion information. ancianita Apr 2025 #68
I heard the interview on MSNBC. TomSlick Apr 2025 #75
I see. Welp, ancianita Apr 2025 #81
IMO going after Dem incumbents is a mistake. So if the candidate he backs to challenge... brush Apr 2025 #62
Why go after fellow Democrats to begin with when there are literally hundreds of Republicans he could be challenging? W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #11
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. We need new approaches and new persepctives, and a primary challenge Celerity Apr 2025 #15
Primary challenges like this only give the other side ammunition. Republicans will win. Walleye Apr 2025 #26
Disagree, as we are talking about safe Blue seats only, one where a Rethug has no shot at winning. Celerity Apr 2025 #31
Off Topic My Friend BOSSHOG Apr 2025 #27
I prefer (for celerity's definition and synonyms) swiftness, legerity, vivacity, expeditiousness, alacrity Celerity Apr 2025 #38
Can they? Because I sure don't see these upstart progressives winning in many purple/red areas. W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #33
But they will give the Republicans plenty of soundbites and ammunition in their campaigns against our incumbents Walleye Apr 2025 #35
people have career aspirations cadoman Apr 2025 #70
We need a lot more like David Hogg. Thanks for setting the record straight Cel. Autumn Apr 2025 #105
There was a lot of pearl clutching when AOC won as a primary challenger HereForTheParty Apr 2025 #4
Yep. AOC replaced someone working as a banking industry protector. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2025 #10
Members of the anti-progressive crew really come out hard against AOC in the 2020 NY-14 Democratic primary, where they Celerity Apr 2025 #51
The pearl clutching metaphor is not working so well. We are genuinely scared now. Walleye Apr 2025 #36
Hogg and AOC seem very different to me PedroXimenez Apr 2025 #37
Then as a Democrat, tell him what you think. ancianita Apr 2025 #49
The guy running against Fetterman in the Primary was a young man JI7 Apr 2025 #5
IMO Harris just preferred Walz's style cadoman Apr 2025 #72
Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Apr 2025 #109
I wonder if all safe districts are the same Raven123 Apr 2025 #7
I don't see how this would open things for primaries that wouldn't otherwise happen EdmondDantes_ Apr 2025 #9
AOC is used JustAnotherGen Apr 2025 #101
If we make it there, I would like to stillcool Apr 2025 #12
I don't see any other Dem in leadership doing anything... SnoopDog Apr 2025 #14
At least 4 centrist, corporate-friendly Dems tried to scupper Biden's pharma cost reductions. These are the type of Dems Celerity Apr 2025 #18
Exactly Celerity...! SnoopDog Apr 2025 #21
thank you for the kind words (I am London raised, 'scupper' is far more commonly used in the UK than the US) Celerity Apr 2025 #39
English seadogs like Francis Drake and Jack Sparrow did a lot of scuppering thought crime Apr 2025 #46
You are on it. cachukis Apr 2025 #32
thanks! Celerity Apr 2025 #40
Thank YOU! This is much appreciated information. ancianita Apr 2025 #50
yw! Celerity Apr 2025 #55
+1 leftstreet Apr 2025 #44
We could replace every single elected Democrat at the federal level right now with Hogg clones and... W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #42
+1 emulatorloo Apr 2025 #73
It's so unbelievable that this message has not sunk in yet. Nixie Apr 2025 #80
Then the clones would be called corrupt establishment and have to be primaried. It would never end. betsuni Apr 2025 #82
The truth, but some people won't acknowledge it Meowmee Apr 2025 #89
Yes! mcar Apr 2025 #97
I fully expect this to fail in spectacular fashion Mountainguy Apr 2025 #19
Yeah, the criminal fucks in the White House are destroying our country. Initech Apr 2025 #23
Absolutely blue-wave Apr 2025 #67
Incumbents will need more money, then the screaming about being beholden to donors billionaires oligarchy betsuni Apr 2025 #25
Democratic Committee Member here JustAnotherGen Apr 2025 #30
More power to him ibegurpard Apr 2025 #34
There is a new generation that see things we don't. cachukis Apr 2025 #41
Yes, and true because they're facing a future we won't be in. ancianita Apr 2025 #58
Because what this Party needs is more of the same! DJ Synikus Makisimus Apr 2025 #43
Growth and change are inevitable in order to live. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #57
hogg not good spokeseman. Groundhawg Apr 2025 #52
He's too new for this kind of rush to judgment. ancianita Apr 2025 #60
Someone or something needs to reinvigorate our party. AllyCat Apr 2025 #54
hogg is what the democrats need moonshinegnomie Apr 2025 #63
I thought we were supposed to be blue-wave Apr 2025 #64
He is young and passionate bottomofthehill Apr 2025 #65
hogg is 25 moonshinegnomie Apr 2025 #69
The strategy should be to elect more Democrats all over. Fact: incumbents get re-elected because voters emulatorloo Apr 2025 #71
More and "better" democrats. Buzz cook Apr 2025 #74
My core principle since becoming politically aware around high school/voting age... Ol Janx Spirit Apr 2025 #77
I suspect ITAL Apr 2025 #86
That will be the case so long as that's what we accept and even come to expect... Ol Janx Spirit Apr 2025 #90
I think it's just as much ITAL Apr 2025 #93
That isn't always a bad thing. Many people rise to prominence in their community... Ol Janx Spirit Apr 2025 #98
He is right Blue Full Moon Apr 2025 #79
I'm already done giving any body another dime Historic NY Apr 2025 #83
I stopped a long time ago and they will never get another penny from me Meowmee Apr 2025 #88
If this keeps up, the Rethugs won't have to worry about 2026... Behind the Aegis Apr 2025 #84
No kidding. MorbidButterflyTat Apr 2025 #102
I support our democratic leadership to take steps to rid corruption within our party SSJVegeta Apr 2025 #85
Exactly who do you think is corrupt within our party? W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #91
Whoever the Democratic party officials see fit to primary. The democratic party can make that determination. SSJVegeta Apr 2025 #92
Any actual corrupt Democrats would be run out of the party by the voters themselves (see: Menendez). W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #112
Fetterman LW1977 Apr 2025 #110
Fetterman is the type of unproven but self-proclaimed """progressive""" that Hogg wants more of. W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #111
He is EXACTLY what we need! LostOne4Ever Apr 2025 #87
I'd applaud an effort to unseat a safe incumbent in MI-12 JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #94
I love David Hogg. Sky Jewels Apr 2025 #96
I'm Team Hogg Prairie Gates Apr 2025 #100
What "safe incumbant" is he running against? Ping Tung Apr 2025 #104
As always, Charlie Pierce is on the nose Hekate Apr 2025 #107
Polling says something has to change. mn9driver Apr 2025 #116
Right there with you mcar. William769 Apr 2025 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Hate to Say This But DN...»Reply #51