Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Would you support a denazification type program if we return to power? [View all]UpInArms
(52,845 posts)162. Denazification In Germany after WWII
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denazification
Denazification (German: Entnazifizierung) was an Allied initiative to rid German and Austrian society, culture, press, economy, judiciary, and politics of the Nazi ideology following the Second World War.[1] It was carried out by removing those who had been Nazi Party or SS members from positions of power and influence, by disbanding or rendering impotent the organizations associated with Nazism, and by trying prominent Nazis for war crimes in the Nuremberg trials of 1946. The program of denazification was launched after the end of the war and was solidified by the Potsdam Agreement in August 1945. The term denazification was first coined in 1943 by the Pentagon,[not verified in body] intended to be applied in a narrow sense with reference to the post-war German legal system. However, it later took on a broader meaning.[2]: 253-254
In late 1945 and early 1946, the emergence of the Cold War and the economic importance of Germany caused the United States in particular to lose interest in the program, somewhat mirroring the Reverse Course in American-occupied Japan. The British occupation handed over denazification panels to the Germans in January 1946, while the American occupation did likewise in March 1946. The French occupation ran the mildest denazification effort. Denazification was carried out in an increasingly lenient and lukewarm way until being officially abolished in 1951. Additionally, the program was hugely unpopular in West Germany, where many Nazis maintained positions of power. Denazification was opposed by the new West German government of Konrad Adenauer,[3] who declared that ending the process was necessary for West German rearmament.[citation needed]
On the other hand, in the Soviet occupation zone and later East Germany, denazification was considered as a critical element of the transformation into a socialist society, and the country was stricter in opposing Nazism than its counterpart.
Not all former Nazis faced judgment. Performing special tasks for the occupation governments could protect Nazi members from prosecution, enabling them to continue working and in some cases reach prominence, as did special connections with the occupiers.[2]: 256 One of the most notable cases involved Wernher von Braun, who was among other German scientists recruited by the United States through Operation Paperclip and later occupied key positions in the American space program.[4]
In late 1945 and early 1946, the emergence of the Cold War and the economic importance of Germany caused the United States in particular to lose interest in the program, somewhat mirroring the Reverse Course in American-occupied Japan. The British occupation handed over denazification panels to the Germans in January 1946, while the American occupation did likewise in March 1946. The French occupation ran the mildest denazification effort. Denazification was carried out in an increasingly lenient and lukewarm way until being officially abolished in 1951. Additionally, the program was hugely unpopular in West Germany, where many Nazis maintained positions of power. Denazification was opposed by the new West German government of Konrad Adenauer,[3] who declared that ending the process was necessary for West German rearmament.[citation needed]
On the other hand, in the Soviet occupation zone and later East Germany, denazification was considered as a critical element of the transformation into a socialist society, and the country was stricter in opposing Nazism than its counterpart.
Not all former Nazis faced judgment. Performing special tasks for the occupation governments could protect Nazi members from prosecution, enabling them to continue working and in some cases reach prominence, as did special connections with the occupiers.[2]: 256 One of the most notable cases involved Wernher von Braun, who was among other German scientists recruited by the United States through Operation Paperclip and later occupied key positions in the American space program.[4]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
192 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I'd support an AG who actually pursues cases against the leaders who committed crimes against the Constitution.
Scrivener7
Apr 17
#5
So to be clear, 80% of respondents favor eliminating, at a minimum, the First and Fourth Amendments?
tritsofme
Apr 17
#9
People supporting putting political opponents in concentration camps. Wild, isn't it?
Hellbound Hellhound
Apr 17
#11
The scary thing is, it doesn't appear to be hyperbole for a lot of these folks.
tritsofme
Apr 18
#144
So why are you against the Constitution? Voting "yes" in this poll means you support eliminating the First and Fourth
tritsofme
Apr 18
#177
How does educating U.S. Citizens about the Evils of Naziism violate the First and Fourth Amendments?
Gore1FL
Apr 18
#155
Yea gee, what's wrong with forcibly detaining people who have committed no crimes?
tritsofme
Apr 18
#157
Deprogramming of the hate belief system would not be in violation of the first amendment.
Clouds Passing
Apr 20
#186
Yikes, disturbing. So everyone that doesn't meet your criteria is just stripped of citizenship and stateless?
tritsofme
Apr 17
#22
Agreed, there is definitely no need to explain such a silly fantasy any further, lol
tritsofme
Apr 17
#25
Hasn't MAGA movement gone past free speech into de-facto policy? Thx in advance
uponit7771
Apr 18
#134
Why not embrace a dictatorship as long you like the dictator? That is really your question?
tritsofme
Apr 17
#31
I think there is a Constutionally compliant middle ground to be had here.
Pacifist Patriot
Apr 17
#28
FFS! Not this sh!t again! A sizable minority (at least I HOPE it is a minority) here on DU have 'Team Blue
kelly1mm
Apr 17
#34
I HOPE it is selection bias. Hell, I am only here on this thread to watch the car wreck ..... nt
kelly1mm
Apr 17
#39
Many are quite supportive of a strong man dictator in charge... as long as he/she favors your side
WarGamer
Apr 17
#44
I'd support, nay, insist upon, aggressive enforcement of existing laws including
RockRaven
Apr 17
#40
Trump and others are is commiting crimes against humanity. He should face a Nuremberg
Demsrule86
Apr 17
#59
This.....plus they would take up arms....the same as I if I thought this was the plan for me.
Melon
Apr 18
#132
Can you at least provide la link to comments you made to those who said they are in favor?
Kaleva
Apr 17
#88
I would if it includes Nuremberg-style trials and accountability. Garland types need not apply for the prosecution.
Efilroft Sul
Apr 17
#79
I would support some of this. and would like to see him and others charged with the covid murders too
Meowmee
Apr 18
#124
He is not immortal. He will either pass away or his party will implode when he's not on the ballot in 2028.
LonePirate
Apr 18
#127
I would not support "tribunals", but the normal civil court process, yes---
Jack Valentino
Apr 18
#130
You forgot the suspension of the prohibition against ex post facto laws
Seeking Serenity
Apr 18
#150
The worst offenders or those that refuse reeducation can be sent to El Salvador.
louis-t
Apr 18
#159
Well, one surefire way to ensure we keep losing elections and maintain embarrassing poll numbers is...
jcmaine72
Apr 20
#184