Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College (James D. Walsh, NYMag. Horrifying read on ChatGPT destroying education) [View all]highplainsdem
(57,409 posts)50. There's nothing truly artistic or creative in having an image generator spit out lots of options and
then choosing one. The AI user isn't creating the image via prompts any more than someone shopping online for a clothing item using keywords created the item they finally chose.
So generating multiple images is precisely what allow the artist to apply their creative eye to select those which are artistic from those which are garbage - in the same way they would from their own sketches.
Stunned that you would compare choosing from images the AI user didn't create to an artist creating original sketches, using their own skills to start work on something they will finish.
Art comes from inspiration, skills, knowledge and intent. AI art is mindless plagiarism. Its mindlessness is why AI users have to be selective. There's more real artistry in a human artist starting with just a few brush strokes or pencil lines than in any number of AI images.
And I'm not aware of any AI image generator that was entirely ethically trained, unless one was trained only on images that were bought or licensed specifically for use as AI training data. There are a lot of very unhappy photographers and artists who discovered that platforms and tools they were using, which had nothing to do with AI originally, had owners who decided the terms of service could be reinterpreted to use those photos and images to train AI to create new images to compete with the photographers' and artists' work. I consider what was done to those creatives a ripoff.
As I recall, too, Adobe, despite early boasting about ethical training of its AI, used countless AI-generated images from Midjourney - infamous for how much intellectual property it stole - to train its Firefly AI tool.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College (James D. Walsh, NYMag. Horrifying read on ChatGPT destroying education) [View all]
highplainsdem
May 7
OP
Good for her. And the teachers I've discussed this with know that oral exams (or a talk with the student
highplainsdem
May 7
#20
Don't forget--this cheating will impact those who enter medical school, law school and others...
hlthe2b
May 7
#4
I remember you praising Grok before (it isn't Groc; never heard of an AI named Groc, but Twitter/X has Grok).
highplainsdem
May 7
#12
I've seen surveys of students indicating that most of them do consider the use of AI
highplainsdem
May 7
#32
There's nothing truly artistic or creative in having an image generator spit out lots of options and
highplainsdem
May 7
#50
I've played with image generators. I know how little control words give the AI user over the image created by
highplainsdem
May 7
#60
I don't disparage photography and never have. But I consider genAI unethical, antithetical to creativity,
highplainsdem
May 7
#67
Photography would never have been considered art if, instead of capturing an image of what's in front of it,
highplainsdem
May 8
#70
You are being very clear that your understanding of AI as part of the creative process is as simplistic,
Ms. Toad
May 8
#74
A camera captures an image of something real in front of the camera. It captures and records
highplainsdem
May 8
#75
If you've never tried to generate an artistic image via an AI prompt, you might want to give it a try
LearnedHand
May 7
#59
I've used image generators. And I know that no matter what the prompt is, it not only doesn't provide
highplainsdem
May 7
#61
Yes. There've been recommendations of going back to handwritten exams using blue books since
highplainsdem
May 7
#15
And some teachers think they should be allowed to use AI to grade their students. Sigh.
highplainsdem
May 7
#21
Unless you're Trump, then each of your ghostwriters and test-takers can have 20 pencils.
JustABozoOnThisBus
May 7
#29
It isn't "theirs" and can never be theirs if they're just altering what a chatbot gave them.
highplainsdem
May 7
#13
The future of America is being made from the ignorance of so called instructors like this.
live love laugh
May 7
#42
I've heard that one tell for AI is AI likes to use dashes in their writing, like colleagues--especially & power--have
FSogol
May 8
#71
By 25 years ago, TV was already taking.up more of kids' time than it had been 10-20 years earlier.
highplainsdem
May 7
#38
You sound like a real teacher, not just a placeholder standing in front of a class. Bravo.
erronis
May 7
#28
there is the incentive to pile up degrees and credentials to get a jump in the hiring process
Demovictory9
May 7
#54
"I spend so much time on TikTok," she said. "Hours and hours, until my eyes start hurting, which makes it hard to plan
Demovictory9
May 7
#55
this is kind of hilarious: students in her Ethics and Tech class used AI to respond to "Briefly introduce yourself and
Demovictory9
May 7
#57
"Massive numbers of students are going to emerge from university with degrees, and into the workforce, who are essentia
Demovictory9
May 7
#58
It's so depressing that it has been happening so fast. I knew it would hurt education, but didn't expect
highplainsdem
May 7
#65