Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,426 posts)
8. A Trump-appointed judge disagrees with you.
Tue May 13, 2025, 04:47 PM
May 2025

Two weeks ago, a Trump-appointed judge found that the AEA could not be used against TdA because there is insufficient evidence that it is acting on behalf of the Venezuelan government.

After extensive analysis of historical records, Judge Rodriguez concluded in his ruling that the ordinary meaning of "invasion" or "predatory inclusion" when the Alien Enemies Act was enacted required a military incursion. He found that the criminal activities of Tren de Aragua members described in the Proclamation, while harmful, did not constitute an "invasion" or "predatory incursion" as understood under the Act.

"The Proclamation makes no reference to and in no manner suggests that a threat exists of an organized, armed group of individuals entering the United States at the direction of Venezuela to conquer the country or assume control over a portion of the nation," Judge Rodriguez wrote.


https://www.npr.org/2025/05/01/g-s1-63830/trump-appointed-federal-judge-blocks-use-of-alien-enemies-act-for-venezuelans-in-south-texas

We need to push back, not just on due process - but on the idea that Trump can randomly declare some group a terrorist organization in the first place.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»🚨 Judge Stephanie...»Reply #8