General Discussion

MarineCombatEngineer

(17,985 posts)

131. You don't know that's what she meant,

Sat May 17, 2025, 03:52 PM

May 2025

she hasn't come back to clarify, so, like me, you're making an assumption.
So, why hasn't the Faux corp. been taken to court over your assertion that Faux is doing what you claim?
Even during the Biden Admin, that didn't happen, gee, I wonder why.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

165 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FoxNews has to be dismantled [View all] clevergrrrl May 2025 OP

"I'll bet you that a good 90% of these people that supposedly voted for him couldn't actually tell you a policy position Demovictory9 May 2025 #1

I Lay It All On The Doorstep of FOXNEWS Mr.Bee May 2025 #79

Can Ya Hear Me Now damifino10 May 2025 #83

Joe Rogan was mocking Biden for talking about airports in the revolutionary war. Gary 50 May 2025 #84

Right there was a turning point Envirogal May 2025 #102

Thats how it goes with them. Hypocrisy is staggering Demovictory9 May 2025 #151

Hypocrisy is one of their entitlements. dchill May 2025 #152

The person they voted for can't explain policy either. yonder May 2025 #103

.... MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #104

Cause bdamomma May 2025 #141

And newsmax, oan, RT and ....... Clouds Passing May 2025 #2

Let's not forget JMCKUSICK May 2025 #22

Heinous they are..... Clouds Passing May 2025 #42

Hi Clouds Passing JMCKUSICK May 2025 #43

They are the masters of social engineering. Gum Logger May 2025 #138

There's been no real anti-fox movement. No protests, no political boycott. tman May 2025 #3

You're correct clevergrrrl May 2025 #5

Yep! There needs to be ReRe May 2025 #20

Forget protests Hieronymus Phact May 2025 #31

excellent point. None. Or 40 years of Limbaugh. Evolve Dammit May 2025 #33

Because there are consequences for that speech in the UK LittleGirl May 2025 #87

Exactly!!! MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #89

anti-trust laws? Cirsium May 2025 #106

"Musk stole the election" The prevailing theory I saw here was that he used Starlink Bonx May 2025 #4

Then why skydive forever May 2025 #11

And you know this... how? Mr. Evil May 2025 #19

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" Bonx May 2025 #34

Insufficient evidence is available when... Chemical Bill May 2025 #46

How does one go about dismantling a media outlet? MichMan May 2025 #6

You start by burning the Constitution onenote May 2025 #9

That is incorrect, we are talking about the free market here clevergrrrl May 2025 #13

You said they shouldn't be "allowed" onenote May 2025 #15

the people can allow or disallow clevergrrrl May 2025 #17

The right wing dominates Cirsium May 2025 #28

Oh, good, just like reproductive rights. mahatmakanejeeves May 2025 #30

I'll say it Cirsium May 2025 #26

So newspapers shouldn't be protected? onenote May 2025 #58

Huh? Cirsium May 2025 #99

You couldn't be more wrong about Douglas onenote May 2025 #122

Not germane Cirsium May 2025 #124

And your claim means what? MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #126

Politics Cirsium May 2025 #139

I'm interested in hearing what anticompetitive behavior FoxNews is engaging in onenote May 2025 #148

I can't help you Cirsium May 2025 #149

I don't like Fox News. But I'm not the one onenote May 2025 #150

Nice to hear Cirsium May 2025 #159

Umm, what broadcasting license would you be talking about? MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #47

Could Vladimir come here and spin up a new channel called VladTV and that would be perfectly legal oldmanlynn May 2025 #76

If it's on cable, internet or satellite, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #77

That is Libertarian doctrine Cirsium May 2025 #108

Libertarian doctrine? MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #113

Can he start a broadcast channel? No. Could he start a satellite delivered network? Probably. onenote May 2025 #90

Thank you. MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #91

Yeah, but there was Republicans who stepped up and said that's enough. You can't obstruct justice oldmanlynn May 2025 #75

It's actually pretty easy... AnAccidentalActivist May 2025 #35

Cable channels don't need broadcast licenses Sympthsical May 2025 #36

Thank You!!! MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #49

This is not about the First Amendment Cirsium May 2025 #109

Are you a US citizen? MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #115

Is anyone? Cirsium May 2025 #143

Ok, ya got me there. MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #144

Thanks Cirsium May 2025 #146

Fair enough. MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #147

FCC broadcast licenses do not apply to cable outlets MichMan May 2025 #37

That was my entire point which everyone seemed to miss AnAccidentalActivist May 2025 #63

Your point wasn't missed, it was factually false MichMan May 2025 #65

Right out the gate this is what you said... MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #66

Well, bye. stumpysbear May 2025 #67

I think the regulations should apply to satellite and cable as well if they don't Meowmee May 2025 #140

By shredding the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #50

They are shredding it anyway LS0999 May 2025 #70

Ok, so Faux gets banned, not going to happen, but just for shits and giggles, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #71

William O. Douglas disagrees Cirsium May 2025 #114

Yes, but what you seem to be missing is that in '69, cable, internet and satellite were non existent, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #116

Whatever Cirsium May 2025 #123

It is entirely relevant to the thread, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #125

Yes Cirsium May 2025 #129

You don't know that's what she meant, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #131

I know what I meant Cirsium May 2025 #137

anti-trust law Cirsium May 2025 #107

The trouble is that any restriction markodochartaigh May 2025 #7

The answer... Hieronymus Phact May 2025 #32

Not much of an answer. Mosby May 2025 #59

What's your answer? Hieronymus Phact May 2025 #61

It's Supreme Court doctrine onenote May 2025 #68

False equivalency Cirsium May 2025 #145

Amen hurple May 2025 #8

100% vapor2 May 2025 #10

Yes Iamscrewed May 2025 #12

I agree we might win in 2026 and 2028 and then the cyle continues Tribetime May 2025 #14

Yes, fascism is taking over in increments clevergrrrl May 2025 #16

We need more education on what Fascism is: ReRe May 2025 #25

I imagine dismantling media outlets that disagree with the state would fit the definition MichMan May 2025 #40

Yep, that sounds like an act of fascism for sure. eom ReRe May 2025 #57

Monopolies Cirsium May 2025 #112

You're preaching to the choir, unfortunately. Wednesdays May 2025 #60

Oh really? ReRe May 2025 #62

Absolutely agree with this statement: slightlv May 2025 #18

Meaning (I trust) 'dismantled' via B.See May 2025 #21

Clevergrrrl, Mr. Evil May 2025 #23

I agree with everything you said. ReRe May 2025 #29

Yup. Throw those fucks out. Joinfortmill May 2025 #24

LOL DENVERPOPS May 2025 #27

Hear, hear! defacto7 May 2025 #38

Good luck Meowmee May 2025 #39

clever Skittles May 2025 #41

Any entity powerful enough to shut down Fox... WarGamer May 2025 #44

Never gonna happen Greg_In_SF May 2025 #45

Relatively few adults watch Fox News Kaleva May 2025 #56

If it's that inconsequential because so few people watch, why all the angst here and elsewhere then? MichMan May 2025 #64

It's a convenient bogeyman Kaleva May 2025 #86

Yeah, start holding your breath on that suggestion now and if wishes were horses, elocs May 2025 #48

Maybe occupy it? StopTheFARCE.051625 May 2025 #51

Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #111

Welcome to DU pdxflyboy May 2025 #52

Dismantled? MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #53

If the problem is "the feeble minds of Middle America and Rural America" then the larger problem is democracy. Jim__ May 2025 #54

It would be nice if we had a reasonable media that accurately labeled right wing propaganda as such. unblock May 2025 #55

Of course Nixon and Reagan were elected long before there was a Fox News. onenote May 2025 #69

Nixon and Reagan were, in their own ways, both quite adept politicians unblock May 2025 #97

Absolutely spot on. Nothing will change until Fox is dismantled or the total collapse of our society. Pepsidog May 2025 #72

Since the OP hasn't replied to my question, I'll ask you, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #73

Agreed, how do we let an Australian oligarch oldmanlynn May 2025 #74

100+!! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2025 #78

We have nothing like... Mike Nelson May 2025 #80

Which is their absolute right under our 1A, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #81

Thank you. If people would pay attention to what the Trump FCC is doing they might think twice onenote May 2025 #92

The question is how? JustAnotherGen May 2025 #82

How do you defeat the incomprehensible? How do people not choose democracy? How do you fix stupid? NowsTheTime May 2025 #85

Ron White said it best. MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #88

90 percent of Krasnov's campaign ads in my red district were about one policy position. GoodRaisin May 2025 #93

Those ads ran incessantly in my area harping on two things, VP Harris supporting surgery for trans inmates and when Silent Type May 2025 #96

Thing is, we handled that very poorly. The campaign never pushed back on the ad GoodRaisin May 2025 #105

No question. We didn't respond quickly or effectively in 2016 either. Silent Type May 2025 #110

Don't watch or care for FOX, but I'd oppose dismantling FOX as unconstitutional and we might be next. Silent Type May 2025 #94

That's what those advocates of this crap don't seem to grasp, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #95

Some folks really do love their dictator porn. tritsofme May 2025 #98

I'll actively oppose dismantling FOX SCantiGOP May 2025 #100

.... MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #101

I don't think Fox should be forced to close. creeksneakers2 May 2025 #117

When I took Journalism looking at it as a possible career.... mdbl May 2025 #119

They don't even try to be accurate creeksneakers2 May 2025 #121

I do Cirsium May 2025 #127

.... MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #128

Pretty condescending Cirsium May 2025 #132

I couldn't care less if you advocate this, that's the great thing about our Constitution. MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #134

It rights don't belong to everybody creeksneakers2 May 2025 #156

Correct Cirsium May 2025 #158

Also, freedom of the press must belong to everybody. creeksneakers2 May 2025 #161

Absurd Cirsium May 2025 #162

Then we have a way to fight back creeksneakers2 May 2025 #163

Oh, I agree Cirsium May 2025 #164

:) creeksneakers2 May 2025 #165

Didn't FDR also put Japanese Americans in internment camps ? MichMan May 2025 #157

Oh, I see Cirsium May 2025 #160

Protesters bdamomma May 2025 #118

Yep, they should be out in force in front of their NY offices, MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #120

+1000 hadEnuf May 2025 #130

We will never get our country back bdamomma May 2025 #133

Anything else you'd like to see banned because you don't like it? flvegan May 2025 #135

.... MarineCombatEngineer May 2025 #136

No thank you. Everyone has the right to watch what they want, and no voices should be shut down. Groundhawg May 2025 #142

Rupert Murdoch ruined American media Funtatlaguy May 2025 #153

How would you propose we dismantle Fox News within the parameters of the 1st Amendment and kelly1mm May 2025 #154

*ALL* corporatized media k_buddy762 May 2025 #155