Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(21,818 posts)
41. Indeed, that is the law quoted in Newsom's suit
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 07:01 PM
Jun 2025

At the time the OP was posted, the suit hadn't yet been filed.

I didn’t see any mention by Newsom of the OP’s claim that NG troops could be held personally responsible for their actions.

The question of the validity of the federalization and deployment is now with the courts, and has yet to be resolved.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Will TACO taco or will he pardon all the troops, or will he double down? Get popcorn out! marble falls Jun 2025 #1
Double Down JustAnotherGen Jun 2025 #48
Gavin needs to communicate this directly to those soldiers. Javaman Jun 2025 #2
I recommend the protestors print that and hand them out to the National Guards. Doodley Jun 2025 #3
I recommend blunt-nosed paper airplanes HariSeldon Jun 2025 #14
Love it! FailureToCommunicate Jun 2025 #24
Oh dude, you have no idea jmowreader Jun 2025 #60
Yes! If only they could be dropped from upper story windows, like confetti parades. FailureToCommunicate Jun 2025 #23
I doubt this matters, since when have laws stopped Trump? dem4decades Jun 2025 #4
He is losing lots of court cases MadameButterfly Jun 2025 #33
I think the goal is to let the Guardspeople know--they don't have spooky3 Jun 2025 #5
So far, I've only seen LA police roughing up anyone. In fact, other than National Guard around detention center, not Silent Type Jun 2025 #6
and I doubt they WILL do much of anything. There's hardly any protest. No rioting. LymphocyteLover Jun 2025 #50
The convict doubled down even worst by calling up Marines, active duty troops... brush Jun 2025 #7
The Insurrection Act of 1807 applies here Kaleva Jun 2025 #18
What insurrection? LearnedHand Jun 2025 #52
Here Kaleva Jun 2025 #59
I'm aware of the Act, but there was no insurrection LearnedHand Jun 2025 #61
They used the Act to do what they did so it is applicable Kaleva Jun 2025 #62
A friend was an officer in the Army in Vietnam. He was ordered to go into Cambodia, armed with a camera and surfered Jun 2025 #8
If they are smart (Which I believe they are) HarryM Jun 2025 #9
Charge who? For what? reACTIONary Jun 2025 #10
Clearly, you are mistaken Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #11
Thank you, although if past is prologue on DU, this misinfo OP will rack up 100+ recs. Celerity Jun 2025 #13
A lie travels around the world... Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #15
as predicted, 122 recs and counting Celerity Jun 2025 #27
+1 Kaleva Jun 2025 #17
Why "clearly." The OP clearly infers Newsom's likely position; so what if it doesn't mention Newsom. You're ancianita Jun 2025 #19
It's not a strawman argument Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #22
It is you that are clearly mistaken. W_HAMILTON Jun 2025 #40
Indeed, that is the law quoted in Newsom's suit Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #41
You're saying a suit needed to be filed to .... what? intrepidity Jun 2025 #43
The suit *alleges* that particular law was violated Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #46
I'm confused Bluesaph Jun 2025 #47
The governor doesnt sign off DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2025 #51
Was that done? Did they follow the procedure? Bluesaph Jun 2025 #58
So if not properly activated, they are held personally accountable? Would they then be held on Scalded Nun Jun 2025 #12
False. nt LexVegas Jun 2025 #16
Gavin seems to be growing a pair. He can throw down the gauntlet and have the CA Guard commander flashman13 Jun 2025 #20
Trump Mblaze Jun 2025 #21
Or something like that. intrepidity Jun 2025 #44
"My evidence refuting the OP's claim is that Newsom (and the AG, and other legal experts) have not made this claim.)..." ancianita Jun 2025 #25
I didn't "call out people's facts as opinions" Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #42
Grabber Blue Ozarks Jun 2025 #26
Before the Civil War, that was correct Polybius Jun 2025 #28
NYTimes had an article on it yesterday - TBF Jun 2025 #29
I have a paywall remover link Polybius Jun 2025 #30
The question is intrepidity Jun 2025 #45
In that case it looks like LBJ was trying to protect marchers - TBF Jun 2025 #54
This is not accurate! It's dangerous misinformation. Please edit/remove. LauraInLA Jun 2025 #31
Are you not aware that Trump federalized this shit specifically so he could do this? Because it sure sounds like it. Karasu Jun 2025 #32
Prosecute them all. Moostache Jun 2025 #34
arrest them under state law moonshinegnomie Jun 2025 #35
All nice but who's doing anything about it? Firestorm49 Jun 2025 #36
Does California need to build it's own military Fullduplexxx Jun 2025 #37
They already have one basically DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2025 #57
Wikipedia is your friend... progressoid Jun 2025 #38
Guest on Nicolle Wallace said the same thing. Katinfl Jun 2025 #39
And will the remedy be remedied? William769 Jun 2025 #49
How does the fed have authority to send NG troops to Iraq? JohnnyRingo Jun 2025 #53
Title 10 DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2025 #56
Thank You. JohnnyRingo Jun 2025 #63
K&R bdamomma Jun 2025 #55
Here is the Court Pinion calling it a violation of the Comstitution: James48 Jun 2025 #64
It's already been reversed on appeal. GaYellowDawg Jun 2025 #65
NO it hasn't. James48 Jun 2025 #66
Well, I'm glad, then GaYellowDawg Jun 2025 #67
What would happen if Newsom ordered his guard to STAY PUT bluestarone Jun 2025 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guard call up is invalid-...»Reply #41