Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(17,109 posts)
18. Looks like it's from a press release from the lead plaintiff, *SMART Elections*
Sat Jun 14, 2025, 10:11 AM
Jun 2025

Last edited Sat Jun 14, 2025, 10:45 AM - Edit history (1)

Looks like the plaintiff is actually SMART Legislation, but both are part of the same organization.


SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, is the lead plaintiff in the case. Both organizations are dedicated to ensuring fair and accurate elections.



https://smartelections.us/press-releases#55bf6c36-7686-4e37-a76f-d8e0ae78c173

A number of outlets ran pieces a couple of days ago, based largely, or entirely, on their press release.

Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean the information is inaccurate, but it's something to keep in mind when evaluating the information presented.

On edit:
I noticed that the press release is very similar to questionseverything's quote except that the press release is clear that the judges order was in regard to discovery.

The Latin Times piece contains questionseverything's quote, I'm not sure why they changed that part from the press release.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you by any chance Susan Calvin Jun 2025 #1
Sorry, no, not sure how to do that Eliot Rosewater Jun 2025 #10
just bring up the transcript at the YT link Celerity Jun 2025 #21
Thanks. nt Susan Calvin Jun 2025 #24
Again, I can't think of a worse time to be looking back to November, speak easy Jun 2025 #2
Every time the Republicans lose, someone with a slick video comes out and says the election was rigged, everyonematters Jun 2025 #3
Clickbait CT nonsense Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #4
Actually the New York Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a hand count for a district questionseverything Jun 2025 #8
Actually, no they haven't. onenote Jun 2025 #12
If you are correct on that, I was still correct in saying more evidence has been submitted questionseverything Jun 2025 #13
I'm curious what you are quoting onenote Jun 2025 #14
It's in my latest post, I just marked it on an earlier thread questionseverything Jun 2025 #15
Looks like it's from a press release from the lead plaintiff, *SMART Elections* sl8 Jun 2025 #18
The video in the op is about electiontruthalliance questionseverything Jun 2025 #22
Was it from the *Smart Elections* press release or something else, based on the press release? sl8 Jun 2025 #23
Context? Link? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #16
Obviously you haven't watched the video posted questionseverything Jun 2025 #19
Not clicking on clickbait nonsense Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #20
If there are those able and B.See Jun 2025 #5
What was all the stuff that Greg Palast came up with? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2025 #6
Palast's work is about how difficult it is for voters to vote questionseverything Jun 2025 #7
Or we will lower our estimation of Don Lemon and Kathy Griffin EdmondDantes_ Jun 2025 #9
Losing two elections by ten million votes? czarjak Jun 2025 #11
Or a normal everyday occurrence. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I told you the election w...»Reply #18