General Discussion

MayReasonRule

(4,048 posts)

18. The Individual That Posted On Bluesky Does Not Have Any History Of Being An Aplogist For Iran As Far As I Know

Tue Jun 17, 2025, 10:51 AM

Jun 2025

Perhaps you are privy to information I am not regarding this individual.

If so it'd be great if you'd post it so as to bring greater clarity to the import of the individual's motives that posted this on Bluesky.

My current assessment is that the individual that posted this on Bluesky posted it in "good faith"... which is why I re-posted here on Democratic Underground.

Be sure and let us know if you find evidence that supports the supposition that you have concluded is most likely.

Thanks and Happy Tuesday!

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wiz Imp SunImp

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There is no nuclear weapons program. [View all] MayReasonRule Jun 2025 OP

no program creon Jun 2025 #1

Yep Goddessartist Jun 2025 #2

Just a cache of near-weapons grade enriched uranium expanded by 50% in the last 3 months--enough for 10 bombs Ponietz Jun 2025 #3

The Point Is That It Is Not An "Imminent Threat" As Is Claimed That Was Necessarly Worthy Of This Strike MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #5

"Imminent" can mean whatever Ponietz Jun 2025 #6

Your idea of imminent and Israel's idea of imminent are far different, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2025 #9

Your Assessment Is As Valid As The Individual That Posted On Bluesky MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #14

Certainly, I mean, Israel wouldn't lie about that. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2025 #16

The problem is you can't be one day late Melon Jun 2025 #24

TSF will bomb Iran anyway. no_hypocrisy Jun 2025 #4

Their foreign policy calls for the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state. nt LexVegas Jun 2025 #7

And Israel's foreign policy calls for the end of Palestine. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2025 #17

How can you end something that doesn't exist? tritsofme Jun 2025 #22

147 UN member states would disagree with you. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2025 #35

OP posted a thread that says Iran has no nuclear weapons program MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2025 #23

Fetterman forgot about PNAC Kid Berwyn Jun 2025 #8

This is pure bull, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2025 #10

K... MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #15

This is sophistry at best, more likely just pure apologism for the Iranian regime. tritsofme Jun 2025 #11

The Individual That Posted On Bluesky Does Not Have Any History Of Being An Aplogist For Iran As Far As I Know MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #18

Is he getting his intelligence from Lindsey Graham? Emile Jun 2025 #12

He's Not A Supporter Of Linsay Graham From What I've Seen... Quite The Opposite Emile MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #20

But according to Netanyahu, Iran has been just weeks away from having a nuke indusurb Jun 2025 #13

Thank Jehoshaphat there is a meme sarisataka Jun 2025 #19

No Doubt That Is Correct... The Reason Given For The Attack Is That There Is An "Imminent Threat" MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #21

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists sarisataka Jun 2025 #25

"unless one believes Israel should wait until Tel Aviv is leveled" Dreamer Tatum Jun 2025 #27

Thank You For The Follow Up! MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #28

de nada sarisataka Jun 2025 #29

The IAEA disagrees. ForgedCrank Jun 2025 #26

I'll Have To Read Through These This Evening...Thank You For Posting The Info Within The Thread! MayReasonRule Jun 2025 #30

What is the greatest threat? The possibility that Iran might have a nuke program, or thousands of nukes that are ready Doodley Jun 2025 #31

Trump is trying to get us into that war. OrlandoDem2 Jun 2025 #32

I don't actually believe that Happy Hoosier Jun 2025 #33

Some years back, WSJ had an article that various countries had a 'nuclear weapons program'. Norrrm Jun 2025 #34

I bet other countries in the ME have nuke program kwolf68 Jun 2025 #36