Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

In It to Win It

(12,564 posts)
Thu Jun 26, 2025, 09:13 AM Jun 2025

SCOTUS holds patients & providers CANNOT challenge a state's decision to ban Planned Parenthood from Medicaid program [View all]

Mark Joseph Stern
‪@mjsdc.bsky.social‬

🚨By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court ALLOWS states to defund Planned Parenthood, holding that Medicaid does not give patients a right to obtain care from its providers. All three liberals dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1275_e2pg.pdf

Gorsuch's opinion for the court holds that Medicaid does not confer a right to patients to choose their health care provider, meaning states can "defund" a provider—here, Planned Parenthood—by refusing to cover care there under its Medicaid program. This will be devastating to Planned Parenthood.

🚨By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court ALLOWS states to defund Planned Parenthood, holding that Medicaid does not give patients a right to obtain care from its providers. All three liberals dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T14:09:04.375Z

Gorsuch's opinion for the court holds that Medicaid does not confer a right to patients to choose their health care provider, meaning states can "defund" a provider—here, Planned Parenthood—by refusing to cover care there under its Medicaid program. This will be devastating to Planned Parenthood.

Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T14:10:21.909Z

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled in Medina v. Planned Parenthood, the case stemming from South Carolina's attempt to kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid.

The Court rules 6-3 that Medicaid doesn't give individuals an unambiguous right to challenge this type of decision.

Garnet Henderson (@garnethenderson.com) 2025-06-26T14:12:55.862Z

Second case is a big one. Medina v. Planned Parenthood. 6-3, usual partisan lines. Case was about whether citizens could sue South Carolina over its decision to kick PP off of Medicaid.

Predictably, the Republicans say no.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

ElieNYC (@elienyc.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T14:11:57.357Z

UGH - Gorsuch has Medina; SCOTUS holds that patients & providers CANNOT challenge a state's decision to ban Planned Parenthood from the Medicaid program ("defund Planned Parenthood" efforts)

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

Leah Litman (@leahlitman.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T14:08:42.513Z

Second (but *not* last) #SCOTUS decision is in Medina v. Planned Parenthood.

For a 6-3 majority (w/ the three Democratic appointees in dissent), Justice Gorsuch holds that private plaintiffs (including Planned Parenthood) can't enforce the "any qualified provider" provision in the Medicaid statute:

Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T14:09:39.747Z
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS holds patients & p...