Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

no_hypocrisy

(53,992 posts) Sun Jul 13, 2025, 05:41 PM Jul 2025

I guess that the reason why there aren't any criticisms of SCOTUS [View all]

Last edited Sun Jul 13, 2025, 08:10 PM - Edit history (1)

decisions by legal scholars (with the exception of Lawrence Tribe, Glenn Kirschner, George Conway, etc.) is because if law professors and/or law review students were to publish such articles, the law schools would be threatened with accreditation by the White House.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I guess that the reason why there aren't any criticisms of SCOTUS [View all] no_hypocrisy Jul 2025 OP

Unless you're talking about op-eds iemanja Jul 2025 #1

De-accreditation, I'm sure -- and you are right. eppur_se_muova Jul 2025 #2

Better BidenRocks Jul 2025 #3

He lost in that attempt. The person selected got something like 90% of the votes. in2herbs Jul 2025 #5

I would guess they are in the background helping to write the lawsuits against the tfg administration. nt in2herbs Jul 2025 #4

Law schools aren't accredited by the president. llmart Jul 2025 #6

I don't think that small detail would stop TSF. no_hypocrisy Jul 2025 #7

He's too stoooopid to realize that. mdbl Jul 2025 #8