Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

flamingdem

(40,835 posts)

36. No wonder Smith has not been indicted

Reply to Grins (Reply #24)

Thu Oct 16, 2025, 12:54 AM

Oct 2025

and feels free to speak out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jack Smith Reveals He Had "Tons of Evidence" Against Trump [View all] Celerity Oct 2025 OP

I really don't know what to do with this. Baitball Blogger Oct 2025 #1

America executed 2 people (the Rosenbergs) for doing exactly what Trump did with those stolen documents Botany Oct 2025 #2

Ethel Rosenberg was innocent OutNow Oct 2025 #26

Ethel was well aware of what her husband was doing Botany Oct 2025 #27

I think Ethel's husband should have gotten life in prison only. Xolodno Oct 2025 #28

if only this had been released prior to the most samsingh Oct 2025 #3

We've handed the country over to criminals and fascists. hadEnuf Oct 2025 #4

They had a long term plan. littlemissmartypants Oct 2025 #7

Really hard to grasp what is happening here. bluestarone Oct 2025 #5

IT WAS THE JUDGE WHO DELAYED THE PROCEEDINGS OVER AND OVER maxsolomon Oct 2025 #41

Yea ty, i remember now, after the supreme court granted immunity, right? bluestarone Oct 2025 #42

Is there s reason kacekwl Oct 2025 #6

Yes. H2O Man Oct 2025 #10

so garland held it back? nt Javaman Oct 2025 #12

No. H2O Man Oct 2025 #13

please elaborate. nt Javaman Oct 2025 #14

Oh, sure. H2O Man Oct 2025 #16

ahh okay, I thought it was. thanks! :) nt Javaman Oct 2025 #17

garland was the ag rampartd Oct 2025 #30

Perhaps you H2O Man Oct 2025 #33

Which one of the Supremes? flamingdem Oct 2025 #35

but he did not release the report, so "yes" rampartd Oct 2025 #31

Wrong. H2O Man Oct 2025 #32

Leaks are very popular kacekwl Oct 2025 #29

They sure can be. H2O Man Oct 2025 #34

Yeah, I know. I'm surprised there haven't been more of them of late. hamsterjill Oct 2025 #44

A kick and a rec for you for providing the archive link. ... littlemissmartypants Oct 2025 #8

kick Passages Oct 2025 #9

Recommended. H2O Man Oct 2025 #11

Well, SOMEBODY needs to be! calimary Oct 2025 #21

Trump is a career criminal that commits Johonny Oct 2025 #15

Halligan will probably indict Smith in the coming weeks. sop Oct 2025 #18

Yup. Even with Halligan's lack of evidence, experience, credentials - just a failed beauty queen. erronis Oct 2025 #20

and it will be a complete joke if so LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #37

It's all meaningless and probably destroyed now because he sat on it. live love laugh Oct 2025 #19

He did prosecute maxsolomon Oct 2025 #43

Jack Smith and Merrick Garland were failures. oldmanlynn Oct 2025 #22

Patience, grasshopper. Garland's got this. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #23

What Smith should do.... 1. Keep it up Grins Oct 2025 #24

No wonder Smith has not been indicted flamingdem Oct 2025 #36

Makes me wonder... WestMichRad Oct 2025 #25

Everyone paying attention knew Dump was guilty as fuck in this documents case. LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #38

Well hold on to it, just in case Abstractartist Oct 2025 #39

Evidence gfarber Oct 2025 #40