Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ilikepurple

(745 posts)
25. I'm not sure why you think revocation is likely. Rules for both officers and supervisors vary greatly by state?
Sat Nov 29, 2025, 07:37 PM
Nov 2025

Standards vary so much by state. I only respond because your post seems to minimize the wandering bad officer issue that has improved, but still remains.
As far as I can tell, South Carolina requires the council can only revoke certification if the officer falsified info on application for certification or training, did not complete required training, or one of the following:
a. Conviction, plea of guilty, plea of no contest or admission of guilt (regardless of withheld adjudication) to a felony, or a crime punishable by a sentence of more than one year (regardless of the sentence actually imposed, if any), or a crime of moral turpitude in this or any other jurisdiction;
b. Unlawful use of a controlled substance;
c. The repeated use of excessive force in dealing with the public and/or prisoners;
d. Dangerous and/or unsafe practices involving firearms, weapons, and/or vehicles which indicate either a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property;
e. Physical or psychological abuse of members of the public and/or prisoners;
f. Misrepresentation of employment-related information;
g. Dishonesty with respect to his/her employer;
h. Untruthfulness with respect to his/her employer;
i. Violations of criminal law resulting from administrative inquiries.
Provided however that in considering whether to withdraw certification based on misconduct, the Council may consider the seriousness, frequency and any mitigating circumstances surrounding the act or omission constituting or alleged to constitute misconduct.
It seems that this horrible act may not fit in one of these categories and even if it did, enforcement is somewhat discretionary.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"What we do in uniform..." ret5hd Nov 2025 #1
Genius Self Sabotaging.. Cha Nov 2025 #2
That he was. sheshe2 Nov 2025 #10
You've got to be a special kind of idiot to do that and then post it on social media MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #3
No kidding! sheshe2 Nov 2025 #7
How quickly will he get a job from Homeland Security/ICE? Botany Nov 2025 #38
I estimate 5 minutes for ICE DFW Nov 2025 #41
One of the first things Trump did was expunge the federal records of 150,000 or 250,000 ex cops ... Botany Nov 2025 #42
Yep..emotional IQ is very low BlueWaveNeverEnd Nov 2025 #13
All I can say is NOTHING HAS CHANGED! I spent nearly 4 years in Sumter, SC in the mid-1960s usaf-vet Nov 2025 #39
Having a big racist in the white house gave him a false sense of security mdbl Nov 2025 #31
It certainly, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #32
He'll probably quickly be hired by a neighboring town. SeattleVet Nov 2025 #4
or dufus appoint appoint him to something AllaN01Bear Nov 2025 #6
Not if his POST certificate is revoked. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #9
There's always Fox News. nt Wednesdays Nov 2025 #33
.... MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #34
I understand ICE is looking for people. sop Nov 2025 #19
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 2025 #5
Good!! Sheriff Rhyne is right: it reflects on all of them, brer cat Nov 2025 #8
We need to dig deeply. sheshe2 Nov 2025 #14
I see an ICE Agent career for this deputy. Gimpyknee Nov 2025 #11
Some of those that work forces, are the same that burn crosses n/t hibbing Nov 2025 #12
Yep. OldBaldy1701E Nov 2025 #37
Are they sure that YN is not short for Mblaze Nov 2025 #15
LOL, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #16
I would love to see this man's personell file, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #20
Seems his identity is being protected, by ski mask and sheriff's office MagickMuffin Nov 2025 #17
Make no mistake, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #18
I'm not sure why you think revocation is likely. Rules for both officers and supervisors vary greatly by state? Ilikepurple Nov 2025 #25
Did you bother to read the whole article? MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #26
Sorry, I did miss Rhyne's comment in the last line. I hope I'm wrong and you and Rhyne are right. Ilikepurple Nov 2025 #29
The Sheriff in the video made it clear that if they do pull his cert. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #30
Rather amazing to me, that a South Carolina sheriff's dept knew what the acronym 'YN' meant, Jack Valentino Nov 2025 #21
First time I have heard of that also. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #22
That particular sheriff's department is a credit to South Carolina! Jack Valentino Nov 2025 #23
What a mighty good man ... live love laugh Nov 2025 #24
Good on that sheriff! electric_blue68 Nov 2025 #27
THIS BidenRocks Nov 2025 #28
He probably saw that story about Whiskey Pete maybe getting fired FoxNewsSucks Nov 2025 #35
Play stupid games MustLoveBeagles Nov 2025 #36
Gratifying to see a proper response from law enforcement. (nt) Paladin Nov 2025 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Absolutely Not be Tolera...»Reply #25