Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mikelewis

(4,594 posts)
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 02:10 PM Dec 5

So... is there any reason they couldn't have stopped the boats and siezed the assets? [View all]

Why is Pete Hegseth ordering the summary execution of alleged criminals?

Why did the U.S. Military not simply stop the boat or engage them on the water? Couldn't the engine have been disabled just as easily and overwhelming naval power brought to bear to sieze the criminals and throw them in Gitmo... or whatever they do?

Why use lethal force when it's not even remotely necessary?

I am certain, at some point, the soldiers who are being tasked to execute these people without due process might struggle with going along with some of the choices they have made. An unlawful order... and summary execution is unlawful. You are not allow to just kill everyone... even in a time of war. Pete Hegseth has gotten people to commit war crimes for his bravado. They will never be punished for it but someone's son or daughter had to kill those people and they didn't have to... they could have just as easily engaged and captured.

What's amazing is how easily everyone just accepts this as ok. It's on CNN and FOX like it's a game show. You get to watch people get executed who were suspected of trafficking narcotics. No trial. No due process. And the world is just ok with it... bizarre.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Except the world isn't OK with it. Disaffected Dec 5 #1
If evidence of the drugs exists. Norrrm Dec 5 #2
The reason: Letting the Coast Guard continue as they have done for decades is not as fun for blood thirsty MAGAs Attilatheblond Dec 5 #3
Murderous psychopaths don't worry about reasons Alice Kramden Dec 5 #4
Because they want to murder and the action you propose isn't that? RockRaven Dec 5 #5
They're trying to intimidate the smugglers. maxsolomon Dec 5 #6
They needed a bigger Epstein distraction. yourout Dec 5 #7
They didn't want to endanger the war ships of the fragile U.S. Navy by 4 guys in a boat. Ping Tung Dec 5 #8
They are lazy. Picking them up and charging them is way too much work and dosnt go BOOM. Srkdqltr Dec 5 #9
The goal of these terrorist attacks by the U.S. has nothing to do with drugs. yardwork Dec 5 #10
I served in the US Navy from 1990 to 2010 aboard 4 different ships in that time NavyDem Dec 5 #11
From someone who's served to another... thank you for your service. mikelewis Dec 6 #20
No reason why they couldn't. With more ships in the area. It's actually easier. haele Dec 5 #12
Blowing up boats is better for ratings... Wounded Bear Dec 5 #13
Three Reasons: Epstein, Epstein and Epstein. It's WAG THE DOG! usonian Dec 5 #14
Not supporting any action taken, but drones, etc., don't get troops killed. We should use those if/when legitimate. Silent Type Dec 5 #15
It's not about interdiction, it's about generating "casus belli" 0rganism Dec 5 #16
I think they should have followed them to shore Emile Dec 5 #17
This is a multi-part operation: Thunderbeast Dec 5 #18
No jollies? Bayard Dec 5 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So... is there any reason...