Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mikelewis

(4,598 posts)
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 03:10 PM Dec 2025

So... is there any reason they couldn't have stopped the boats and siezed the assets? [View all]

Why is Pete Hegseth ordering the summary execution of alleged criminals?

Why did the U.S. Military not simply stop the boat or engage them on the water? Couldn't the engine have been disabled just as easily and overwhelming naval power brought to bear to sieze the criminals and throw them in Gitmo... or whatever they do?

Why use lethal force when it's not even remotely necessary?

I am certain, at some point, the soldiers who are being tasked to execute these people without due process might struggle with going along with some of the choices they have made. An unlawful order... and summary execution is unlawful. You are not allow to just kill everyone... even in a time of war. Pete Hegseth has gotten people to commit war crimes for his bravado. They will never be punished for it but someone's son or daughter had to kill those people and they didn't have to... they could have just as easily engaged and captured.

What's amazing is how easily everyone just accepts this as ok. It's on CNN and FOX like it's a game show. You get to watch people get executed who were suspected of trafficking narcotics. No trial. No due process. And the world is just ok with it... bizarre.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Except the world isn't OK with it. Disaffected Dec 2025 #1
If evidence of the drugs exists. Norrrm Dec 2025 #2
The reason: Letting the Coast Guard continue as they have done for decades is not as fun for blood thirsty MAGAs Attilatheblond Dec 2025 #3
Murderous psychopaths don't worry about reasons Alice Kramden Dec 2025 #4
Because they want to murder and the action you propose isn't that? RockRaven Dec 2025 #5
They're trying to intimidate the smugglers. maxsolomon Dec 2025 #6
They needed a bigger Epstein distraction. yourout Dec 2025 #7
They didn't want to endanger the war ships of the fragile U.S. Navy by 4 guys in a boat. Ping Tung Dec 2025 #8
They are lazy. Picking them up and charging them is way too much work and dosnt go BOOM. Srkdqltr Dec 2025 #9
The goal of these terrorist attacks by the U.S. has nothing to do with drugs. yardwork Dec 2025 #10
I served in the US Navy from 1990 to 2010 aboard 4 different ships in that time NavyDem Dec 2025 #11
From someone who's served to another... thank you for your service. mikelewis Dec 2025 #20
No reason why they couldn't. With more ships in the area. It's actually easier. haele Dec 2025 #12
Blowing up boats is better for ratings... Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #13
Three Reasons: Epstein, Epstein and Epstein. It's WAG THE DOG! usonian Dec 2025 #14
Not supporting any action taken, but drones, etc., don't get troops killed. We should use those if/when legitimate. Silent Type Dec 2025 #15
It's not about interdiction, it's about generating "casus belli" 0rganism Dec 2025 #16
I think they should have followed them to shore Emile Dec 2025 #17
This is a multi-part operation: Thunderbeast Dec 2025 #18
No jollies? Bayard Dec 2025 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So... is there any reason...