General Discussion

usonian

(24,066 posts)

14. Three Reasons: Epstein, Epstein and Epstein. It's WAG THE DOG!

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 03:05 PM

Dec 5

Why a war?

Because the Epstein event horizon is rapidly approaching.
Wag the Dog.

Even if the DOJ (Defenders of Jeffrey) lock up all they have in an ion trap, evidence will come out condemning TSF's complicity in the greatest sex and extortion scandal in history.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220810679

He is beyond desperate. This is his Ethiopia (If he didn't fail history, he sure didn't learn from it)

So, like the movie, what if he molested a troop of brownie scouts? Make a war.

Trump: We don't want to be the policemen of the world BY BRETT SAMUELS - 04/30/18

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20729427

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/385521-trump-we-dont-want-to-be-the-policemen-of-the-world/

President Trump on Monday said the U.S. should no longer serve as the “policemen of the world.”

“We more and more are not wanting to be the policemen of the world,” Trump said during a joint press conference with Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari.

“We’re spending tremendous amounts of money for decades policing the world, and that shouldn’t be the priority,” he said.

Trump ran on the promise that he would extricate the U.S. from foreign wars.

NOW, WAR IS NEEDED TO TRY TO COVER UP HIS UTTER DEPRAVITY.

Which, when exposed will take down his entire empire and entourage, kings, heads of state, (ahem) judges, and others.

No ballroom or Arc De "Trumph" legacy.

Roger Ebert on "Wag the Dog" (mods are mine)

In the movie, a U.S. president is accused of luring an underage “Firefly Girl” into an anteroom of the Oval Office, and there presenting her with opportunities no Firefly Girl should anticipate from her commander in chief. A ~~presidential election~~ Deluge of Epstein Dirt is weeks away,

Why drug smugglers?

And why now?

Others here think alike:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/127012987

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So... is there any reason they couldn't have stopped the boats and siezed the assets? [View all] mikelewis Dec 5 OP

Except the world isn't OK with it. Disaffected Dec 5 #1

If evidence of the drugs exists. Norrrm Dec 5 #2

The reason: Letting the Coast Guard continue as they have done for decades is not as fun for blood thirsty MAGAs Attilatheblond Dec 5 #3

Murderous psychopaths don't worry about reasons Alice Kramden Dec 5 #4

Because they want to murder and the action you propose isn't that? RockRaven Dec 5 #5

They're trying to intimidate the smugglers. maxsolomon Dec 5 #6

They needed a bigger Epstein distraction. yourout Dec 5 #7

They didn't want to endanger the war ships of the fragile U.S. Navy by 4 guys in a boat. Ping Tung Dec 5 #8

They are lazy. Picking them up and charging them is way too much work and dosnt go BOOM. Srkdqltr Dec 5 #9

The goal of these terrorist attacks by the U.S. has nothing to do with drugs. yardwork Dec 5 #10

I served in the US Navy from 1990 to 2010 aboard 4 different ships in that time NavyDem Dec 5 #11

From someone who's served to another... thank you for your service. mikelewis Dec 6 #20

No reason why they couldn't. With more ships in the area. It's actually easier. haele Dec 5 #12

Blowing up boats is better for ratings... Wounded Bear Dec 5 #13

Three Reasons: Epstein, Epstein and Epstein. It's WAG THE DOG! usonian Dec 5 #14

Not supporting any action taken, but drones, etc., don't get troops killed. We should use those if/when legitimate. Silent Type Dec 5 #15

It's not about interdiction, it's about generating "casus belli" 0rganism Dec 5 #16

I think they should have followed them to shore Emile Dec 5 #17

This is a multi-part operation: Thunderbeast Dec 5 #18

No jollies? Bayard Dec 5 #19