Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

3Hotdogs

(15,327 posts)
11. Admitting that he did it AND that he did it in response to the "stolen election," probably gets him off the hook.
Sat Dec 6, 2025, 08:36 AM
Dec 2025

If not, and he gets convicted before Trump dies in office, he could get a pardon. After all, he set the bombs in support of Trump.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So he didn't really have to pardon all of those people separately Walleye Dec 2025 #1
this is sometimes warranted . carter pardoned the "draft dodgers" rampartd Dec 2025 #5
Carters draft dodger pardon was not "a complete and uncondtional pardon to all individuals" ToxMarz Dec 2025 #9
just the only time i've seen pardons or multiple unnamed people rampartd Dec 2025 #15
He will probably walk away unpunished. Emile Dec 2025 #2
Which might be ok, if it wasn't him... nt Shipwack Dec 2025 #3
I think he has already admitted that he did it. Emile Dec 2025 #4
Admitting that he did it AND that he did it in response to the "stolen election," probably gets him off the hook. 3Hotdogs Dec 2025 #11
Not if the pipe bombs were placed on Jan. 5. bluedigger Dec 2025 #6
Good point but this could be "related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021" ToxMarz Dec 2025 #8
The January 6th part is unambiguous. W_HAMILTON Dec 2025 #13
Yes, related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. ToxMarz Dec 2025 #14
It literally does. W_HAMILTON Dec 2025 #16
What it actually literally says is ToxMarz Dec 2025 #17
You keep erasing "related to" Anxy Dec 2025 #24
Was it intended to blow up on January 6th? Anxy Dec 2025 #23
IMHO, "related to events" eliminates any date restriction debsy Dec 2025 #7
Yes, this pardon was to cover the politicians Johonny Dec 2025 #19
Has his picture ever been published? KS Toronado Dec 2025 #10
The pipe bombs were planted on January 5th... W_HAMILTON Dec 2025 #12
Were they intended to detonate on January 5 or the 6th?? Anxy Dec 2025 #25
There is no way his lawyers wont inquire Johonny Dec 2025 #18
I'd be surprised if Trump and the mob want "planting bombs" to count as "related to our peaceful demo ... muriel_volestrangler Dec 2025 #20
the language was drafted intentionally broad. harumph Dec 2025 #21
I doubt that Presidential Proclamation covered future cases. Make7 Dec 2025 #22
Does that mean he pardoned himself, NameAlreadyTaken Dec 2025 #26
He is already pardoned, the "related" part covers him. The coup rolls on. Prob get his name on the arch Blues Heron Dec 2025 #27
When was he "convicted?" onenote Dec 2025 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legeally Speaking, hasn't...»Reply #11