General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Hakeem Jeffries' new slogan for the Democratic Party is so ineffective [View all]A phrase doesn't qualify as a slogan unless it is repeated every time the person talks to the press?
About the slogan Jeffries himself said thats what we believe in as Democrats.
The slogan comes from a book title that promotes the usual "third way" drivel. Blurb from the "strong floor no ceiling" website: "a radically moderate plan that combines the best ideas from left and right to rebuild opportunity for every citizen." It is worse than just a bad slogan.
You suggest that the author and people here are cherry picking one remark and misrepresenting Jeffries.
Yet you are misrepresenting the author's main point. Here are excerpts that are representative.
"Anyone who thinks the problem is that America isnt properly nurturing everyones thirst for entrepreneurialism has been spending too much time talking to wealthy donors."
"The slogan is emblematic of an approach the partys leadership always seems to take. Theyre so afraid they might offend someone they decline to call out genuine villains."
You may think that third way politics is the best course for the Democrats to take, or perhaps you support third way politics whether or not is the best course for electoral success by the Democrats. Others oppose third way politics and think third way politics is is not a good electoral strategy. Argue your case on its merits rather than attacking people.