There’s a generational divide on what that reform should entail, a new Cato Institute poll of 2,000 respondents found. Members of Generation Z, those born between 1997 and 2012, were eight times more likely than those 65 and older to say they support reducing benefits for current and future retirees to fix the program’s finances — 47% versus 6%, the poll found.

More than half of respondents under age 30 said younger workers should be protected from higher taxes even if it means reducing benefits for current retirees, compared to 89% of adults age 65 and older who said current retirees’ benefits should be protected even if it means increasing taxes for younger workers.

Cato asked participants how they would feel about various reform tactics, such as increasing taxes, in a few ways. Almost 6 in 10 people (58%) said they would favor raising “income taxes,” while 63% said they would favor increasing “payroll taxes as much as necessary” if it meant maintaining benefits. When asked if they would be willing to raise those payroll taxes from 12.4% to 16.05%, more than half (55%) said yes. But when they were asked about dollar figures, there was less support: Only 23% said they would be willing to pay $1,300 more a year in taxes to maintain benefits.

Young adults also were more likely to misunderstand how the program pays out benefits, the Cato poll found. Half of Gen Z members thought Social Security taxes were saved for them, such as in a personal account or invested in the trust fund, and just 29% knew that what they paid in taxes was used for current retirees in the pay-as-you-go system.