General Discussion

highplainsdem

(61,991 posts)

22. I'd prefer just a clear-cut rule against posting anything AI-generated, with an exception made for

Sun Dec 21, 2025, 11:48 AM

Dec 2025

genAI slop needed as an example. And a waiver for people who weren't aware something was AI-generated.

I recommended yesterday that FarPoint leave a Robert De Niro deepfake in her OP

https://www.democraticunderground.com/132299818

because she was going to complain directly to YouTube about it, and without leaving the video she couldn't show as clearly both which video it was and how much harm the deceit did. (The creator of that video has now added the synthetic-content label YouTube tells their creators they have to add, but the label wasn't there originally.) I also thought it was a useful example because the wording of a disclaimer in the YouTube descriptions suggested the creator is the same fraudster who earlier had fooled DUers with deepfakes of Jimmy Kimmel and Obama.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

eppur_se_muova

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The atomic ensemble time scale at the NIST Boulder campus has failed. [View all] LiberalArkie Dec 2025 OP

Can't see Threads posts canetoad Dec 2025 #1

There is a status monitoring system that shows them down as of 8PM MT Renew Deal Dec 2025 #4

OMG !1! dweller Dec 2025 #2

I asked ChatGPT if this is a big deal. Renew Deal Dec 2025 #3

Please don't post chatbot answers here. That answer could be wrong in lots of ways, but you can't highplainsdem Dec 2025 #9

As someone who worked in time & frequency for 25 years, the answer is pretty spot on... Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #11

Hey, another time nerd! cos dem Dec 2025 #12

I will continue to do it and label it when I do. Renew Deal Dec 2025 #13

The only reason ChatGPT appears to work at all is the theft of the world's intellectual property, and it highplainsdem Dec 2025 #15

When somebody announces that it's a chatbot answer, that is sufficient synni Dec 2025 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author highplainsdem Dec 2025 #18

No, that isn't sufficient, because many people are still not aware that chatbot answers can be filled highplainsdem Dec 2025 #19

Speaking of illegal training data ... DU posts can be alerted on for violations of copyright law. If AIs routinely ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2025 #21

I'd prefer just a clear-cut rule against posting anything AI-generated, with an exception made for highplainsdem Dec 2025 #22

So would I, but some here are strangely enthusiastic about II (Imitation Intelligence, which is what AI really is) ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2025 #23

It can be tempting for people to use AI if they think it saves them time, or makes them appear more highplainsdem Dec 2025 #27

No worries. Permanut Dec 2025 #5

We have now officially entered dweller Dec 2025 #6

Does anybody really know what time it is? Orrex Dec 2025 #7

(Care) does anybody really care? Ol Janx Spirit Dec 2025 #10

The time is... Jacson6 Dec 2025 #14

We only have enough time edhopper Dec 2025 #24

Good excuse to be late for work Monday. JohnnyRingo Dec 2025 #8

Music Video - Time - Phil Keaggy Jacson6 Dec 2025 #16

I like this Time song and asked the kids to play it when I croak. TheBlackAdder Dec 2025 #20

Love Alan Parsons. Unfortunately, he's now having to deal with AI-using frauds: highplainsdem Dec 2025 #25

I've been a big fan of his since the 1970s lapfog_1 Dec 2025 #28

Time is but the stream I go a-fishing in. usonian Dec 2025 #26

My daughter who lives in Boulder has told me for two weeks about the power being shut off. Not a surprise for someone efhmc Dec 2025 #29

Will the universe notice? Probably not. Norrrm Dec 2025 #30

Anyone who relies on those servers for PCI DSS compliance could be in for a world of hurt dickthegrouch Dec 2025 #31