Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

meadowlander

(5,132 posts)

4. Just tried it out and it works :-D

Reply to Arthur_Frain (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 22, 2025, 06:43 PM

Dec 2025

Having used redaction features on software before, it is a pain in the backside to get right. I was half waiting for something like this to happen given the competence levels of the parties involved.

I think it's already pretty damning that none of the text above meets any possible criteria for redaction that I can see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The DoJ did not properly redact the documents. Hopefully these are fully downloaded. [View all] Mr.WeRP Dec 2025 OP

All Bots Please Unite!!!! MayReasonRule Dec 2025 #1

This sounds waaaaayyyyyy too good to be true. Arthur_Frain Dec 2025 #2

Just tried it out and it works :-D meadowlander Dec 2025 #4

I suspect some career DoJ folks gave out the instructions on how to redact Mr.WeRP Dec 2025 #5

Ha, ha para 86 meadowlander Dec 2025 #6

I wouldn't put it past them to "leak" something fake eShirl Dec 2025 #3

Based on what's redacted, I don't think that is the case Mr.WeRP Dec 2025 #7

Anyone have the full recently released files Iwasthere Dec 2025 #8