Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Battleships were largely obsolescent by the beginning of WW2. The new "Trump Class" ships, if actually built will [View all]Silent Type
(12,412 posts)1. Think battleships are obsolete too, mostly good for bullying foreign nations by putting them offshore. I do think
the new "trump" class ships are much smaller, more in line with blowing up small boats and quick missions. But they are risky.
Hopefully, someone with thwart attempts to call them "trump class."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Battleships were largely obsolescent by the beginning of WW2. The new "Trump Class" ships, if actually built will [View all]
artemisia1
Dec 22
OP
Think battleships are obsolete too, mostly good for bullying foreign nations by putting them offshore. I do think
Silent Type
Dec 22
#1
When the ship pummels the shore with shells, will that be a Trump Golden Shower?
TheBlackAdder
Dec 22
#31
35,000 tons for "Trump" Class vs. 57,000 tons for the WW2 Iowa Class Battleships. You are right. Battlecruiser
artemisia1
Dec 22
#11
And far short of the 70,000 tons Yamato and Musashi Japanese battleships, which were ACTUALLY
Jack Valentino
Dec 22
#24
Sinking of Prince of Wales and Repulse 10 December 1941. When it was discovered that even battle ready
artemisia1
Dec 22
#9
If they do build them then can we put him and his administration on them and send them to Caribbean waters?
chowder66
Dec 22
#18
Trump's understanding of the term 'battleship' likely begins with 'a row-boat with shotguns'
Jack Valentino
Dec 22
#25
MaddowBlog-Trump names battleship class after himself, advancing his personalization crusade
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 23
#39
New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 26
#44
