Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,435 posts)
Wed Dec 24, 2025, 10:58 AM Dec 2025

'Hugely consequential': Experts say Supreme Court just wrecked Trump's plans [View all]

I admit that I was surprised by this ruling. SCOTUS may be waking up as to trump's misuse of the military.

'Hugely consequential': Experts say Supreme Court just wrecked Trump's plans

www.rawstory.com/supreme-cour...

Michael Byron #Fella (@michaelby.bsky.social) 2025-12-24T02:30:22.213Z

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-2674826050/

President Donald Trump got a rare and devastating blow at the Supreme Court on Tuesday, as three right-wing justices joined with the three liberals to deny a stay of a lower court ruling that prevents him from federalizing the National Guard to deploy troops to Chicago — and said the administration is unlikely to prevail when the case is litigated on the merits.....

"The Supreme Court just agreed: President Trump violated the law by deploying the National Guard in Illinois," wrote New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin. "Proud to stand with @ILAttyGeneral [and] my colleagues in successfully opposing this unnecessary and unlawful deployment."

Yet another key analysis came from American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a lawyer who has frequently criticized the Trump administration's immigration policy.

"Wow. Genuinely shocked, and a hugely consequential decision. This is a case where [law professor] Marty Lederman's amicus brief appears to have made a MAJOR impact. Before he wrote it, courts were sidestepping the 'regular forces' issue entirely. And that's what the Trump admin lost on," wrote Reichlin-Melnick. "The law Trump used to federalize the National Guard requires him to be 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' The Court today agrees with Professor Lederman that 'regular forces' means the U.S. military, which used to be called 'the regulars.'"

"There are other laws which permit the President to call up the National Guard, the most famous of which is the Insurrection Act. But Trump has not invoked that law. Instead, he invoked a law which had strict prerequisites, which the Supreme Court ruled were not met," wrote Reichlin-Melnick. Additionally, "the majority finds at this stage that the President does not have inherent authority to deploy the military to protect ICE property, therefore allowing him to 'execute' the laws with the military. The majority says no."
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They'll just send in more ICE goons... johnnyplankton Dec 2025 #1
Yea popsdenver Dec 2025 #24
The Sick Fuck BlueMTexpat Dec 2025 #2
I would hope that the Supreme Court is waking up to their stupid decision to give Trump immunity for most actions. Lonestarblue Dec 2025 #3
well, yes. but a completely different issue (of course) stopdiggin Dec 2025 #4
Well immunity gives him the ability Farmer-Rick Dec 2025 #33
non sequitur. that is not what 'immunity' means - nor what the court said. stopdiggin Dec 2025 #36
In all practical purpose it does Farmer-Rick Dec 2025 #37
The Supreme Court hasn't ruled yet on Trump's global tariffs. sop Dec 2025 #5
If SCOTUS goes against Trump on the tariffs.... RussBLib Dec 2025 #7
Promise? vapor2 Dec 2025 #19
no RussBLib Dec 2025 #20
The Republican Party popsdenver Dec 2025 #25
Yes. Although Steve Miller and Russell Vought already use Project 2025 as a day-to-day game plan... Mister Ed Dec 2025 #29
BINGO........M.E. popsdenver Dec 2025 #35
Either way Akakoji Dec 2025 #31
This received very little coverage on M$Greedia malaise Dec 2025 #6
on Wed., 12-12:30 NJCher Dec 2025 #8
True - but it was barely mentioned in Prime Time malaise Dec 2025 #12
2 of the 3 major networks covered it RussBLib Dec 2025 #22
Precisely malaise Dec 2025 #30
CBS News reported it online. Thats where I saw it Callie1979 Dec 2025 #23
In the dissent: Chellee Dec 2025 #9
There you have it Mysterian Dec 2025 #13
I was sure that 2 of them were Alito and Thomas and was not disappointed there! ShazzieB Dec 2025 #15
Good news. Martin68 Dec 2025 #10
So I expect he will invoke the insurrection act very soon. Bev54 Dec 2025 #11
They always do -- for him. live love laugh Dec 2025 #18
This decision could impact Trump's ability to deploy national guard to other states LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #14
Yeah, Psycho PEDO's fucking Cha Dec 2025 #17
Uh oh.. mountain grammy Dec 2025 #16
Negotiating time lame54 Dec 2025 #21
K&R spanone Dec 2025 #26
He needs to be stopped in regards to Greenland. C Moon Dec 2025 #27
As if he cares JoseBalow Dec 2025 #28
I know... weird, isn't it? OldBaldy1701E Dec 2025 #32
"... no one seems capable of stopping this crap." JoseBalow Dec 2025 #34
Two late Trump court defeats 'could make a big difference in 2026': analyst LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #38
So, what does he do? kentuck Dec 2025 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Hugely consequential': E...