Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here are some previews of trump's new "battleship" [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(174,706 posts)21. New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert
This battleship makes no sense and will never be built
New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' â and will never sail: expert
— (@bobshaw-28.bsky.social) 2025-12-26T21:50:29.523Z
www.rawstory.com/alternet-pos...
https://www.rawstory.com/alternet-posts/trump-battleship/
Donald Trump's much-hyped new battleship fleet, named after himself, "will never sail," a group of experts told CNBC in a new report, owing to the outdated design that will make them a "bomb magnet" in a real conflict.
Earlier this week, the president unveiled a new "Trump-class" of US Navy battleships, which he touted as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and "the fastest, the biggest, and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built." Despite his enthusiasm from Trump about maintaining "American military supremacy," CNBC on Friday noted the "glaring problem" putting them at odds with reality: "battleships have been obsolete for decades."
"The last was built more than 80 years ago, and the U.S. Navy retired the last Iowa-class ships nearly 30 years ago," CNBC explained. "Once symbols of naval might with their massive guns, battleships have long since been eclipsed by aircraft carriers and modern destroyers armed with long-range missiles."
The outlet conceded that Trump's labeling of these new ships with the outdated model name could be a "misnomer," and the actual ships might be more in line with modern sensibilities. Speaking to several experts about the ships, however, CNBC found that the "Trump-class" fleet is still out of step with naval realities, with Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, arguing that they "would take too long to design, cost far too much and run counter to the Navys current strategy of distributed firepower."
"A future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water," Cancian said, also adding that "there is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail."
Earlier this week, the president unveiled a new "Trump-class" of US Navy battleships, which he touted as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and "the fastest, the biggest, and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built." Despite his enthusiasm from Trump about maintaining "American military supremacy," CNBC on Friday noted the "glaring problem" putting them at odds with reality: "battleships have been obsolete for decades."
"The last was built more than 80 years ago, and the U.S. Navy retired the last Iowa-class ships nearly 30 years ago," CNBC explained. "Once symbols of naval might with their massive guns, battleships have long since been eclipsed by aircraft carriers and modern destroyers armed with long-range missiles."
The outlet conceded that Trump's labeling of these new ships with the outdated model name could be a "misnomer," and the actual ships might be more in line with modern sensibilities. Speaking to several experts about the ships, however, CNBC found that the "Trump-class" fleet is still out of step with naval realities, with Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, arguing that they "would take too long to design, cost far too much and run counter to the Navys current strategy of distributed firepower."
"A future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water," Cancian said, also adding that "there is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You could do tens of thousands more AI slop pictures like that, none of which are 1/10 as effective as
highplainsdem
Dec 25
#8
I don't understand people who don't consider it too unethical to use because of the intellectual property
highplainsdem
Sunday
#26
Would you be willing to consider posting links to articles about the issues you mention?
ShazzieB
Sunday
#28
I've posted hundreds of OPs, mostly with articles, about AI here over the last 3 years, ever since
highplainsdem
Sunday
#30
And btw, all people have imaginations. Imagination alone isn't creativity. If people don't have the
highplainsdem
Sunday
#29
There is no precedent for any class of ships being named after a living president
FakeNoose
Dec 25
#18
No American president has ever named ships or institutions after himself--until now.
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 26
#20
New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 26
#21