Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Battleships were largely obsolescent by the beginning of WW2. The new "Trump Class" ships, if actually built will [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(177,198 posts)44. New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert
This battleship makes no sense and will never be built
New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' â and will never sail: expert
— (@bobshaw-28.bsky.social) 2025-12-26T21:50:29.523Z
www.rawstory.com/alternet-pos...
https://www.rawstory.com/alternet-posts/trump-battleship/
Donald Trump's much-hyped new battleship fleet, named after himself, "will never sail," a group of experts told CNBC in a new report, owing to the outdated design that will make them a "bomb magnet" in a real conflict.
Earlier this week, the president unveiled a new "Trump-class" of US Navy battleships, which he touted as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and "the fastest, the biggest, and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built." Despite his enthusiasm from Trump about maintaining "American military supremacy," CNBC on Friday noted the "glaring problem" putting them at odds with reality: "battleships have been obsolete for decades."
"The last was built more than 80 years ago, and the U.S. Navy retired the last Iowa-class ships nearly 30 years ago," CNBC explained. "Once symbols of naval might with their massive guns, battleships have long since been eclipsed by aircraft carriers and modern destroyers armed with long-range missiles."
The outlet conceded that Trump's labeling of these new ships with the outdated model name could be a "misnomer," and the actual ships might be more in line with modern sensibilities. Speaking to several experts about the ships, however, CNBC found that the "Trump-class" fleet is still out of step with naval realities, with Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, arguing that they "would take too long to design, cost far too much and run counter to the Navys current strategy of distributed firepower."
"A future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water," Cancian said, also adding that "there is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail."
Earlier this week, the president unveiled a new "Trump-class" of US Navy battleships, which he touted as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and "the fastest, the biggest, and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built." Despite his enthusiasm from Trump about maintaining "American military supremacy," CNBC on Friday noted the "glaring problem" putting them at odds with reality: "battleships have been obsolete for decades."
"The last was built more than 80 years ago, and the U.S. Navy retired the last Iowa-class ships nearly 30 years ago," CNBC explained. "Once symbols of naval might with their massive guns, battleships have long since been eclipsed by aircraft carriers and modern destroyers armed with long-range missiles."
The outlet conceded that Trump's labeling of these new ships with the outdated model name could be a "misnomer," and the actual ships might be more in line with modern sensibilities. Speaking to several experts about the ships, however, CNBC found that the "Trump-class" fleet is still out of step with naval realities, with Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, arguing that they "would take too long to design, cost far too much and run counter to the Navys current strategy of distributed firepower."
"A future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water," Cancian said, also adding that "there is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Battleships were largely obsolescent by the beginning of WW2. The new "Trump Class" ships, if actually built will [View all]
artemisia1
Dec 22
OP
Think battleships are obsolete too, mostly good for bullying foreign nations by putting them offshore. I do think
Silent Type
Dec 22
#1
When the ship pummels the shore with shells, will that be a Trump Golden Shower?
TheBlackAdder
Dec 22
#31
35,000 tons for "Trump" Class vs. 57,000 tons for the WW2 Iowa Class Battleships. You are right. Battlecruiser
artemisia1
Dec 22
#11
And far short of the 70,000 tons Yamato and Musashi Japanese battleships, which were ACTUALLY
Jack Valentino
Dec 22
#24
Sinking of Prince of Wales and Repulse 10 December 1941. When it was discovered that even battle ready
artemisia1
Dec 22
#9
If they do build them then can we put him and his administration on them and send them to Caribbean waters?
chowder66
Dec 22
#18
Trump's understanding of the term 'battleship' likely begins with 'a row-boat with shotguns'
Jack Valentino
Dec 22
#25
MaddowBlog-Trump names battleship class after himself, advancing his personalization crusade
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 23
#39
New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 26
#44
