Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,198 posts)
44. New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 06:49 PM
Dec 26

This battleship makes no sense and will never be built

New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' — and will never sail: expert

www.rawstory.com/alternet-pos...

(@bobshaw-28.bsky.social) 2025-12-26T21:50:29.523Z

https://www.rawstory.com/alternet-posts/trump-battleship/

Donald Trump's much-hyped new battleship fleet, named after himself, "will never sail," a group of experts told CNBC in a new report, owing to the outdated design that will make them a "bomb magnet" in a real conflict.

Earlier this week, the president unveiled a new "Trump-class" of US Navy battleships, which he touted as "some of the most lethal surface warfare ships" and "the fastest, the biggest, and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built." Despite his enthusiasm from Trump about maintaining "American military supremacy," CNBC on Friday noted the "glaring problem" putting them at odds with reality: "battleships have been obsolete for decades."

"The last was built more than 80 years ago, and the U.S. Navy retired the last Iowa-class ships nearly 30 years ago," CNBC explained. "Once symbols of naval might with their massive guns, battleships have long since been eclipsed by aircraft carriers and modern destroyers armed with long-range missiles."

The outlet conceded that Trump's labeling of these new ships with the outdated model name could be a "misnomer," and the actual ships might be more in line with modern sensibilities. Speaking to several experts about the ships, however, CNBC found that the "Trump-class" fleet is still out of step with naval realities, with Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, arguing that they "would take too long to design, cost far too much and run counter to the Navy’s current strategy of distributed firepower."

"A future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water," Cancian said, also adding that "there is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Think battleships are obsolete too, mostly good for bullying foreign nations by putting them offshore. I do think Silent Type Dec 22 #1
When the ship pummels the shore with shells, will that be a Trump Golden Shower? TheBlackAdder Dec 22 #31
They're not battleships, they're frigates. bluedigger Dec 22 #2
You might be confusing the new proposed frigate with this one Kaleva Dec 22 #5
Perhaps so, and I still believe none of it. bluedigger Dec 22 #10
It's the DDGX program guided missile fleet upgrade NickB79 Dec 22 #15
This will replace the proposed DDG(X) program Kaleva Dec 22 #33
Trump's battleship is absurd and will never happen. Just comic relief. thought crime Dec 23 #41
The FF(X) program looks promising Kaleva Dec 23 #42
Yes, it does. thought crime Dec 24 #43
He's the co-designer. He's said they will be "the biggest". muriel_volestrangler Dec 22 #6
They're definitely not frigates jmowreader Dec 22 #19
History is about to repeat itself. Girard442 Dec 22 #3
battleships were made obsolete Dec. 7, 1941 nt msongs Dec 22 #4
The Vasamuseet is one of the great places to visit here in Stockholm. 💛💙🇸🇪 Celerity Dec 22 #28
What is being proposed is not really a battleship sarisataka Dec 22 #7
35,000 tons for "Trump" Class vs. 57,000 tons for the WW2 Iowa Class Battleships. You are right. Battlecruiser artemisia1 Dec 22 #11
And far short of the 70,000 tons Yamato and Musashi Japanese battleships, which were ACTUALLY Jack Valentino Dec 22 #24
So basically this class is a guided missile cruiser, Emile Dec 22 #8
Sinking of Prince of Wales and Repulse 10 December 1941. When it was discovered that even battle ready artemisia1 Dec 22 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Dec 22 #12
Extremely expensive and will take years to design. haele Dec 22 #13
Something else for the next reality-based President to have to cancel. Beartracks Dec 22 #27
After billions are wasted. /nt artemisia1 Dec 23 #38
Battleships were very useful in WWII SocialDemocrat61 Dec 22 #14
These Ships Aren't About Battle! They Will Be For 2 Things: ColoringFool Dec 22 #16
N. Korea built a battleship recently. It sank when they tried to launch it. n/t Jacson6 Dec 22 #17
It was a destroyer that NK tried to launch sarisataka Dec 22 #21
If they do build them then can we put him and his administration on them and send them to Caribbean waters? chowder66 Dec 22 #18
The US is not capable of building these ships AverageOldGuy Dec 22 #20
Make way for another G R I F T.... littlemissmartypants Dec 22 #22
The ship being proposed is not a "battleship" in the classic sense relayerbob Dec 22 #23
Trump's understanding of the term 'battleship' likely begins with 'a row-boat with shotguns' Jack Valentino Dec 22 #25
Agreed. /nt artemisia1 Dec 23 #35
It's ego and grift. Irish_Dem Dec 22 #26
I hope Trump lives long enough to see a aircraft oasis Dec 22 #29
Yes! YepYep Dec 22 #30
Trump Class in honor of Epstein. Turbineguy Dec 22 #32
To be fair the tRump class will be AI controlled making it unsinkable yaesu Dec 23 #34
...and it does not identify as being sunk. PCIntern Dec 23 #36
He doesn't care if they are obsolete. It's all about him, not the ship. OLDMDDEM Dec 23 #37
MaddowBlog-Trump names battleship class after himself, advancing his personalization crusade LetMyPeopleVote Dec 23 #39
get the net!!!! spanone Dec 23 #40
New battleships named after Trump are 'bomb magnets' -- and will never sail: expert LetMyPeopleVote Dec 26 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Battleships were largely ...»Reply #44