Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

highplainsdem

(62,100 posts)
Mon Dec 29, 2025, 02:15 PM Dec 2025

If you support unions (DUers should) but still think it's OK to post AI slop, see the hundreds of Bluesky replies [View all]

to this post of AI slop. Real anger and outrage from union members and union supporters.

I posted about this earlier but didn't realize, till I saw one of the replies to my thread, that some people here still don't understand that anger and outrage.

I did post a very small selection of the responses, but that small selection really can't convey the backlash that users/supporters of genAI deservedly get from union members and supporters who are focused on the ongoing battle against those who harm and exploit workers.

So I'm posting this separate thread because on a message board where we should support unions, people need to understand just how jarring and disgusting posting AI slop here WILL look to a lot - probably the vast majority - of union members and supporters who are new to this board. Where we've been seeing more and more slop here as if it's harmless entertainment, or somehow effective in fighting Trump. I've been trying to make it clear to DUers that even if it's anti-Trump, it's still pro-AI and pro-exploitation and anti-worker and anti-artist and anti-human.

And if you use it, you undermine your own credibility if you want people to think you oppose all the harm done by genAI. Including to workers.

See the reactions in the replies, and the quote-reposts, to the Bluesky post below, AI slop posted by the head of a teacher's union. Viewing the replies will require clicking on the post to see it on a separate page on Bluesky. If you seem to have run out of replies after reading for a while, look for the link to click for more at the bottom left of the visible replies. If you don't know how to find the quote-repost type of reply where the comments on the message below are above the quoted message, you just click the word quotes below the message you'll see on Bluesky.

And please read ALL of them, if you don't understand why it's wrong to use genAI.

This one was such fun… so I am sharing

Randi Weingarten 🖇️📚✊🇺🇸 (@rweingarten.bsky.social) 2025-12-25T15:03:54.480Z
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A lot of AI is ridiculously obvious; but some are not. hlthe2b Dec 2025 #1
Oops, wrong reply mike_c Dec 2025 #4
I saved my reply to yours, if you want to repost your "don't throw out the baby with the bath water" highplainsdem Dec 2025 #9
I know. But we have people here who are knowingly posting AI slop as if it's somehow a plus on a highplainsdem Dec 2025 #6
True -- and I'm pretty confident that was the root purpose of this OP. KPN Dec 2025 #35
So easy to spot, so awful. I've tried a few YouTube short NewHendoLib Dec 2025 #2
And those AI-slop documentaries are flooding YouTube now, making it harder and harder to find real highplainsdem Dec 2025 #16
And a lot of the AI slop that we see on social media PatSeg Dec 2025 #23
As far as the ones that are less obvious.. mdbl Dec 2025 #30
That's interesting PatSeg Dec 2025 #36
Is this video from George Conway real or fake? Renew Deal Dec 2025 #59
Fake, and it's labeled "Altered or synthetic content" on the video thumbnail, and the YouTube channel highplainsdem Dec 2025 #63
This very upsetting, Highplainsdem!! brakester Dec 2025 #67
That youtube channel isn't affiliated with Conway at all. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2025 #68
Disclaimer brakester Dec 31 #84
Kick SheltieLover Dec 2025 #3
Thanks! highplainsdem Dec 2025 #17
Yw SheltieLover Dec 2025 #21
K&R. Thanks for your work. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2025 #5
You're welcome! Thanks for everything you've posted about this, too. highplainsdem Dec 2025 #10
r&k MerryBlooms Dec 2025 #7
Thank you! highplainsdem Dec 2025 #18
Excellent responses in that thread. progressoid Dec 2025 #8
I'll Second That! ProfessorGAC Dec 2025 #13
Hundreds. There should be a link to see more replies when you get to the end of the first batch. highplainsdem Dec 2025 #19
I Thought I Did ProfessorGAC Dec 2025 #22
You have to click on her post here highplainsdem Dec 2025 #24
I Did ProfessorGAC Dec 2025 #41
Aren't they, though? As much as she upset her own union members and left them feeling betrayed, their highplainsdem Dec 2025 #14
Generated AI for content is slop...but AI technology is here to stay and will continue to exponentially grow. Melon Dec 2025 #11
GenAI is a technological dead end, inherently flawed with hallucinations, fundamentally unethical because of highplainsdem Dec 2025 #12
Agreed on the ethics part of it but GenAI isn't going anywhere either. The bubble will burst but there will be survivors FascismIsDeath Dec 2025 #76
There's enough of a backlash already that I think we can reach a point where it's considered highplainsdem Dec 31 #79
Yea I think you're giving our citizens way too much credit. FascismIsDeath Dec 31 #81
I'm just going off what I've read and heard, but based on that, I'm expecting more and highplainsdem Dec 31 #83
Oh yea, it definitely causes problems. FascismIsDeath Jan 1 #85
Microplastics are here to stay as well, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to eat less of them. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2025 #15
Right! highplainsdem Dec 2025 #20
So what? Cirsium Dec 2025 #26
You can be against anything...like the protest over cars versus buggy's Melon Dec 2025 #50
Horrible Cirsium Dec 2025 #52
No it's not. The race for AI dominance is driving all the market volatility we see... Melon Dec 2025 #64
It's a bubble Cirsium Dec 2025 #66
No country is going to get to AGI, let alone ASI, building more data centers for genAI, which is the highplainsdem Dec 2025 #58
Somebody tell Thom Hartman Bobstandard Dec 2025 #25
Has he changed it recently? Cirsium Dec 2025 #28
He shouldn't be using AI. It's an insult to real musicians and helps only AI bros. He could ask his highplainsdem Dec 2025 #40
DU ain't as pro-union as it likes to think it is. LudwigPastorius Dec 2025 #27
Well, we're all endangered by genAI now, and even if DUers aren't in unions, they need to understand highplainsdem Dec 2025 #33
Opposing that bill didn't have anything to do with being anti-union EarlG Dec 2025 #37
Thanks for explaining! Just googled the date for that and it was back when caregiving and highplainsdem Dec 2025 #42
I disagree, and I'm not going to argue , but I will say... LudwigPastorius Dec 2025 #43
I'm not opposed to meaningful legislation that would stem the tide of copyrighted works online EarlG Dec 2025 #46
As I've told other DUers who were professional musicians, we'd love to hear your music, if you highplainsdem Dec 2025 #61
SOPA awful though Polybius Dec 2025 #62
Thanks Cirsium Dec 2025 #29
You're very welcome! Thanks for the reply! highplainsdem Dec 2025 #44
What worries me The Madcap Dec 2025 #31
It's insane for companies to risk their own data that way. But I've never seen as much hype to highplainsdem Dec 2025 #45
Feel like we should bring back the un-rec experiment nilram Dec 2025 #32
Why would you want to unrec a post about how union members and supporters feel about AI slop? If highplainsdem Dec 2025 #34
Wasn't clear: wanting to unrec AI slop, not this thread. nilram Dec 2025 #48
Thanks for explaining! I'm relieved to hear that's what you meant. highplainsdem Dec 2025 #51
Kicked for visibility. Seems our species denial of unintended consequences KPN Dec 2025 #38
Thanks! And I agree that entirely too many people are unable to see or deliberately ignoring all the highplainsdem Dec 2025 #47
I have earned my living... GiqueCee Dec 2025 #39
I'm so sorry you ran into that. I agree that business types, suits, are often both too contemptuous of artists, and highplainsdem Dec 2025 #55
Wow...I missed this...i guess bc I'm not really following stuff closely, being out of the field.... electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #73
I could hardly believe how vicious the "Chamber of Progress" people were when talking about highplainsdem Dec 2025 #74
Lord knows, most artists are not wealthy! electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #75
Astute business sense... GiqueCee Dec 31 #82
As a former graphic designer, and sometimes illustrator, when not doing clerical work, and long time artist of 55+ yrs.. electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #72
I wish you the best of luck with the new painting, and I think the disgust with AI slop and the backlash highplainsdem Dec 2025 #77
Thanks for this breakdown, and for your good wishes! electric_blue68 Dec 31 #80
"Anyone can be an artist now!" - AI Tech Bros Oneironaut Jan 1 #86
Would that the subject matter be in a glass jar, controlled. cachukis Dec 2025 #49
I'm outraged... WarGamer Dec 2025 #53
I'm amused that you think that's a good reply countering what all those people were saying. But hey, highplainsdem Dec 2025 #56
No way to block it on here, is there? TommyT139 Dec 2025 #54
A forum just for posting AI slop and talking about how wonderful AI is would be an even worse look highplainsdem Dec 2025 #57
Block what? Renew Deal Dec 2025 #60
Add AI "artwork" to that list, I'd say (nt) Orrex Dec 2025 #78
kick highplainsdem Dec 2025 #65
Kick electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #69
Thanks! highplainsdem Dec 2025 #70
YW electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #71
I'm a creative, I'll never support the use of "AI" for any reason. None at all. mucholderthandirt Jan 2 #87
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you support unions (DU...