Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gfarber

(199 posts)
31. Emoluments Clause
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 01:29 PM
Tuesday


At a Trump broadcast coast to coast,
A reporter stepped up to the bloke:
“Please tell us on air,
With receipts if you dare,
How billions were earned—no clause broke?”

With the cameras all glowing quite bright,
And the audience tuned in that night,
Came a query direct:
“Can you help us connect
Your profits with law done just right?”

The Emoluments Clause took the stage,
Not a whisper, but a front-page engage.
“Three billion, you say?
While in office—okay…
Could you walk us through that to quell the rage?”

No sidebars, no spin, no delay,
Just a question in plain USA:
“As President sworn,
How were fortunes still grown
Without crossing constitutional gray?”

The crowd held its breath, live and still,
As the mic hovered close to the grill:
“Explain, if you would,
For the public’s own good—
How the math works and follows the will.”

On a stage with a bald eagle seal,
Came a question both simple and surreal:
“Three billion, sir—how?
As President, wow.
Was the Clause on vacation in Peel?”

With confetti and cannons galore,
And a crowd yelling “Encore! Encore!”
Someone asked through a kazoo,
“Is that income from you,
Or from hotels that bill foreign decor?”

The Emoluments Clause wore a hat,
Said, “I thought we agreed I’d watch that.”
But it blinked twice, confused,
As the profits accrued,
And fell asleep on a velvet doormat.

A moderator, nervous but brave,
At a nationally televised wave,
Asked, “Explain to us all,
With a pie chart or scrawl,
How billions obeyed what you gave.”

Was it pennies? Was it gold? Was it air?
Was it branding? Was it hair?
Asked the crowd in a hush,
As accountants went shush,
And the Clause did a shrug from its chair.

A jumbotron flickered and froze,
Showing numbers in clownish repose:
“Three billion earned clean?
While running the scene?
Please show us the math, if you chose.”

Then a trombone went wah-wah on cue,
As the question just hovered and grew:
“How does one make a stack,
While the law says ‘step back’—
Is it magic? Or hotels? Or glue?”

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Law without prosecution is merely a suggestion. usonian Monday #1
"Law without prosecution is merely a suggestion mdbl Monday #7
No media have the spine to ask him that. n/t CousinIT Monday #2
Neither does ANYONE else. IMHO. Captain Zero Monday #3
I always thought they should have impeached for everything... Chemical Bill Monday #22
Sadly, the USSC kind of said emoluments are not a problem...nt Wounded Bear Monday #4
Covering their own ass on this gravy train ride. KPN Monday #11
That won't happen with this crop of "journalists". LoisB Monday #5
Well, there wouldn't be a satisfying answer PatSeg Monday #6
His answer: I don't know anything about it - my sons are running things. Look, SQUIRREL! Marie Marie Monday #8
Ha, ha, sounds about right PatSeg Monday #9
Frontotemporal dementnia MadameButterfly Monday #16
Yep, which confirms PatSeg Monday #20
But it still should be asked because.... electric_blue68 Monday #13
Yes, absolutely PatSeg Monday #14
Perfect! KPN Monday #10
He would say leftieNanner Monday #12
He'd first ask "Who are you with?" Seinan Sensei Tuesday #29
"Emoluments" is a Democrat hoax, a scam. JustABozoOnThisBus Monday #15
I'm sorry to disagree Dan, JMCKUSICK Monday #17
You know I have thought about that in reference to the Red States Farmers Dan Monday #23
Nope. They know he is lying but they want immigrants gone and liberals punished for something or other. travelingthrulife Tuesday #28
He wouldn't ABC123Easy Monday #18
They all know they will be banned! nt ProudProgressiveNow Monday #19
He's dumb enough to reply "$3 billion? Terrible reporter, I made $6 billion. $3 billion is fake news. flvegan Monday #21
Trump can't even pronounce " Emoluments Clause"..... much less understand it Jack Valentino Monday #24
Reporters should surely ask the question vapor2 Monday #25
He is a pathological liar, and would flatly deny it. Martin Eden Tuesday #26
I think I would add... OldBaldy1701E Tuesday #27
Waste of time. His answer would be,"because I'm a great businessman." Martin68 Tuesday #30
Emoluments Clause gfarber Tuesday #31
Outstanding!!! Dan Tuesday #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I would like to hear some...»Reply #31