Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(1,951 posts)
12. That kind of shared sacrifice could lead to more nuanced discussions about foreign policy.
Sat Jan 3, 2026, 12:46 PM
Jan 2026

The idea is that if everyone (or their loved one's) life is potentially on the line, people might be more invested in making thoughtful decisions about going to war. It's not just about sending nameless and faceless 'our troops' to fight; it's about sending our kids, our neighbors, and ourselves.

I believe it could reduce support for unprovoked invasions and encourage more diplomatic solutions. But, at the same time, it could disproportionately affect certain groups, like low-income communities and those who cannot afford "deferments" or "bone spurs" exceptions.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump is now a "WAR PRESI...»Reply #12