Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Please, stop with the TERM LIMITS bs. [View all] 4bonhoffer 13 hrs ago OP
You are so right. Americanme 12 hrs ago #1
That's a good point Conjuay 12 hrs ago #2
Same! EuterpeThelo 12 hrs ago #9
re: "Agreed we should primary those who aren't effective" thesquanderer 9 hrs ago #54
I agree with you. Its ridiculous. Callie1979 4 hrs ago #75
100% Right on! NT CommonHumanity 12 hrs ago #3
I think that the longer someone stays in politics, the more likely they have convictions. everyonematters 12 hrs ago #4
Yes, or to feather their nest, lately that's the goal Walleye 12 hrs ago #6
I agree 100%, besides it's unconstitutional, not that that matters anymore Walleye 12 hrs ago #5
How is it unconstitutional? iemanja 2 hrs ago #85
The Constitution sets the qualification for representatives and senators. TomSlick 42 min ago #88
Term limits who have deprived us . . Michiblue 12 hrs ago #7
There are just as many good reasons for term limits as there are bad ones. sop 12 hrs ago #8
+1 leftstreet 10 hrs ago #35
We need campaign finance reform MadameButterfly 10 hrs ago #37
Because they are two sides of the same bright, shiny coin. Maru Kitteh 8 hrs ago #65
i also object to the party putting thumbs on the scale to promote the leadership's MadameButterfly 6 hrs ago #67
I agree with that. I guess I was primarily speaking to the poster's Maru Kitteh 2 hrs ago #83
This message was self-deleted by its author Maru Kitteh 3 hrs ago #76
Bingo. See reply at #39 harumph 9 hrs ago #46
How about putting the other changes in place MadameButterfly 6 hrs ago #68
They WHERE CALLED ELECTIONS now they are called how do we screw the voters and keep them from voting. usaf-vet 11 hrs ago #10
which, of course - doesn't address the subject (or point made) in the OP in the slightest ... - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 10 hrs ago #43
I agree PatSeg 11 hrs ago #11
we need real term limits..two terms and out... agingdem 11 hrs ago #12
I've been preaching this for years. Not to mention the revolving door to lobbying would accelerate... themaguffin 11 hrs ago #13
Term limits are aniicemocratic. If they've been there too long vote em out. tirebiter 11 hrs ago #14
There are so many things that need to be reformed before we can even consider term limits ibegurpard 11 hrs ago #15
Preach! ybbor 11 hrs ago #16
The problem is gerrymandering, not term limits. Emile 11 hrs ago #17
I've been arguing against term limits for years. Martin Eden 11 hrs ago #18
Very difficult to overcome incumbent name recognition MichMan 2 hrs ago #81
Every citizen should recognize the name of their representative in the House and both senators Martin Eden 58 min ago #87
Totally agree DownriverDem 11 hrs ago #19
I'll take it a step further Polybius 11 hrs ago #20
let's hold off until trump is out. We don't need to give him even more incentive to fuck things up. themaguffin 11 hrs ago #22
He's more unpopular than ever now though Polybius 11 hrs ago #23
Obama isn't going to run. Getting past this shit show is priority 1 themaguffin 9 hrs ago #61
at this point - cab67 5 hrs ago #70
100% agree. The best argument against term limits is this question: Pototan 11 hrs ago #21
I like that analogy. tinrobot 10 hrs ago #29
No question homegirl 38 min ago #89
Yes! radical noodle 11 hrs ago #24
If elections define one's term . . . otchmoson 11 hrs ago #25
it just empowers staffers. mopinko 11 hrs ago #26
Yes, because it's important to have octogenerians driving our culture relayerbob 11 hrs ago #27
Thank you. We need to fix election financing, gerrymandering, and the electoral college. tinrobot 11 hrs ago #28
I would make one exception - cab67 10 hrs ago #30
there is no way to remove Supreme Court justices ibegurpard 10 hrs ago #32
Please stop telling people what to consider/debate Mysterian 10 hrs ago #31
How about for SCOTUS? CaptainTruth 10 hrs ago #33
The voters NEVER got a choice there stopdiggin 9 hrs ago #52
Yes, clearly. And I still think it makes sense to have term limits for SCOTUS. CaptainTruth 9 hrs ago #60
I'm in favor of 8 years for SC Justices LogDog75 5 hrs ago #71
Interesting. Thanks for sharing! CaptainTruth 3 hrs ago #80
I agree with you and add this point: Mr. Mustard 2023 10 hrs ago #34
Make them fill out job applications leftstreet 10 hrs ago #36
What we need is campaign finance reform Beausoleil 10 hrs ago #38
I used to be in the no term limits camp - not anymore. harumph 10 hrs ago #39
except that 'term limits' doesn't really address any of the aggrievements you have with the system stopdiggin 9 hrs ago #49
I think we need an age limit for service Mosby 10 hrs ago #40
You are right. I was so impressed with our Dems in Congress during the Ghislaine Bondi hearings this past weekend Maraya1969 10 hrs ago #41
I believe in term limits. Layzeebeaver 10 hrs ago #42
Term limits has always been the province of the low brow, bumper sticker mentality stopdiggin 10 hrs ago #44
Term limits don't solve a single problem. Its a populist slogan that adds zero value to anything. FascismIsDeath 10 hrs ago #45
I'm a believer in term limits. However, back during the Gingrich days, the repugs talked term limits until they got Wonder Why 9 hrs ago #47
Do you favor repeal of the 22nd amendment? n/t Shrek 9 hrs ago #48
Both that and the age-baiting arguments have too many flaws Torchlight 9 hrs ago #50
We already have term limits: the voting cycle. Get the vote out. Stop accepting your vote means nothing ... marble falls 9 hrs ago #51
Florida is the poster child for the corrupting influence of term limits. hay rick 9 hrs ago #53
B I.N.G.O. markodochartaigh 9 hrs ago #57
I disagree ABC123Easy 9 hrs ago #55
In my opinion - cab67 5 hrs ago #69
You may be able to pass laws to limit partisan gerrymandering, BUT . . . markpkessinger 4 hrs ago #73
Agreed! ABC123Easy 2 hrs ago #82
WHY IS NOBODY SAYING the bottom line. markodochartaigh 9 hrs ago #56
Example: what if Chris Murphy of Adam Schiff were ALBliberal 9 hrs ago #58
I am with you on this. pandr32 9 hrs ago #59
Agreed, for additional reasons: Exp 9 hrs ago #62
Nationalization of politics, blaming those crooks off in Washington, Drain the Swamp. But not their own reps! betsuni 9 hrs ago #63
Completely agree! MatthewStLouis 8 hrs ago #64
Agree completely. Term limits are really just a limit on Democracy. It's telling voters they can't have their chosen tritsofme 8 hrs ago #66
I favor term limits for Executive offices and Supreme Courts LogDog75 4 hrs ago #72
Sorry I still support an Amendment for term limits. Lifetime seats have gotten ridiculous. Callie1979 4 hrs ago #74
Citizen's United is the "corporate wet dream" that term limits, well, limits Dave says 3 hrs ago #77
I whole heartedly agree 👍 Figarosmom 3 hrs ago #78
Agreed! People only want term limits when the don't like who's in office. JohnnyRingo 3 hrs ago #79
Why is it that people think they have a right to censors others' posts and thoughts iemanja 2 hrs ago #84
Can we at least change the presidential term limit to 1 week for this presidency only? mdbl 1 hr ago #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please, stop with the TER...»Reply #48