Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]DET
(2,480 posts)69. I ask myself that all the time
There must have been at least a handful of people who knew what was in the Epstein files during the previous administration. Anyone who knew or at least suspected that Trump was involved in an international child sex trafficking ring and said nothing has a whole lot to answer for. Covid was under control by the run up to the 2024 election. And Trump had been convicted of rape and multiple felony counts at that point. The potential for someone as demonstrably evil as Trump to win the Presidency (again) - knowing what he was capable of - should have overridden any concerns re judicial protocol, especially given the fact that the Republicans had rigged the judiciary.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe because for some incomprehensible reason Dem presidents appoint pukes to AG & FBI?
SheltieLover
Feb 16
#13
The goal of blaming Democrats: they believe in rule of law/the system but the system is irrevocably corrupt
betsuni
Feb 16
#46
I'm not sure OP was talking about releasing the Maxwell files as much as keeping the issue alive.
Ilikepurple
Feb 17
#56
They wanted to win on more pressing issues than Epstein, which some felt didn't matter after he got away ...
marble falls
Feb 16
#9
I am glad that this is a conversation that's happening without being hijacked. It's an important question.
Scrivener7
Feb 16
#11
The DOJ was not fighting COVID. We had other governmental departments whose job that was. THIS was the DOJ's job.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#75
There were far more pressing things going on in the country, like the pandemic. n/t
valleyrogue
Feb 16
#37
i believe the situation demanded that we do that - we were historically and catastrophically negligent
samsingh
Feb 16
#45
But that leaves the question: knowing what he knew, and he must have known, why did Garland not reveal something
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#71
They had the Epstein files. He should have known. He should have been briefed on what was in them, and that
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#73