Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]standingtall
(3,148 posts)70. The files were sealed, because of the Maxell conviction and appeal
Maybe Biden could've used his Presidential powers to unseal them, but it he didn't believe in interfering with the DOJ. Evident by letting his own Son get prosecuted I know he pardoned him and said he wouldn't, but he should've pardoned him. Garland was a huge mistake he could've should've prosecuted Trump for about a million things before we even get to the Epstein files. Biden was to generous I think Garland's appointment was a makeup for him getting blocked from the Supreme Court. Should've picked Jack Smith. Garland worked quicker to prosecute Hunter Biden then he did Trump enough said.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe because for some incomprehensible reason Dem presidents appoint pukes to AG & FBI?
SheltieLover
Feb 16
#13
The goal of blaming Democrats: they believe in rule of law/the system but the system is irrevocably corrupt
betsuni
Feb 16
#46
I'm not sure OP was talking about releasing the Maxwell files as much as keeping the issue alive.
Ilikepurple
Feb 17
#56
They wanted to win on more pressing issues than Epstein, which some felt didn't matter after he got away ...
marble falls
Feb 16
#9
I am glad that this is a conversation that's happening without being hijacked. It's an important question.
Scrivener7
Feb 16
#11
The DOJ was not fighting COVID. We had other governmental departments whose job that was. THIS was the DOJ's job.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#75
There were far more pressing things going on in the country, like the pandemic. n/t
valleyrogue
Feb 16
#37
i believe the situation demanded that we do that - we were historically and catastrophically negligent
samsingh
Feb 16
#45
But that leaves the question: knowing what he knew, and he must have known, why did Garland not reveal something
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#71
They had the Epstein files. He should have known. He should have been briefed on what was in them, and that
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#73