Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(178,412 posts)
32. Furious Trump wants 'rehearing' after 'highly disappointing' Supreme Court defeat
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:36 PM
Saturday

trump really does not want to refund the illegal tariffs

President Donald Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court again on Friday, questioning whether a "Rehearing or Readjudication" is possible after the justices dealt a devastating blow to his tariff agenda one week ago.

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-02-28T02:00:21Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-supreme-court-2675368843

President Donald Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court again on Friday, questioning whether a “Rehearing or Readjudication” is possible after the justices dealt a devastating blow to his tariff agenda one week ago.

In a lengthy post on Truth Social, Trump claimed the ruling “could allow for Hundreds of Billions of Dollars to be returned to Countries and Companies that have been ‘ripping off’ the United States of America for many years."

"And now, according to this Decision, could actually continue to do so, at an even increased level,” he argued. “I am sure that the Supreme Court did not have this in mind!”

“It doesn’t make sense that Countries and Companies that took advantage of us for decades, receiving Billions and Billions of Dollars that they should not have been allowed to receive, would now be entitled to an undeserved ‘windfall,’ the likes of which the World has never seen before," Trump added.

The president insisted the high court could not have intended such an outcome and called the decision “highly disappointing, to say the least.” He then added: “Is a Rehearing or Readjudication of this case possible???”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Was it a threat? /nt bucolic_frolic Feb 25 #1
Not sure. Joinfortmill Feb 25 #3
Of course it was, although he was a bit more explicit in his enraged niyad Feb 25 #18
AGREED vapor2 Feb 25 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Joinfortmill Thursday #31
I'm shocked he left it at unfortunate. dem4decades Feb 25 #2
The consensus seems to be that everything not totally unhinged was Suzy Wiles putting her foot down... Volaris Feb 25 #12
Me too. I didn't think he could command that much self-control Bluetus Feb 25 #20
Could somebody please turn the settings up? niyad Feb 25 #22
im glad they see their handi work in progress samnsara Feb 25 #4
After shaking boof boys hand, chelsea0011 Feb 25 #5
Maybe she's "not his type". llmart Feb 25 #6
Sure wouldn't want that snub to influence her decision-making down the road .... TheRickles Feb 25 #7
How many justices were present? Dulcinea Feb 25 #9
4. Roberts, Kavanaugh, Kagan and Barrett. Katinfl Feb 25 #11
And Kagan looked like she drew the short straw this time. Volaris Feb 25 #13
Clarance was probably taking a nap or trying to hide Ginny's gin bottle. 3Hotdogs Feb 25 #17
Ooh, a middle school burn. That's how you show a Supreme Court Justice who's boss! tanyev Feb 25 #10
That might be a good thing for us. Joinfortmill Feb 25 #16
A rapist doesn't listen when a woman tells him "no" Walleye Feb 25 #29
We need to write our R Congress Critters and ask........... KS Toronado Feb 25 #8
I'm surprised Kavanaugh wasn't groveling at his feet whining to be invited to an Epstein... NNadir Feb 25 #14
Roberts knows the president is an unstable moron dalton99a Feb 25 #15
Mere whimsy NJCher Feb 25 #21
How DARE they... GiqueCee Feb 25 #19
"I told you before that you blew the Citizens United case, muf. Now look at what you've done, you arrogant ass." Marcuse Feb 25 #23
President Shitzinpants blows hot air out his ass Emile Feb 25 #24
He wants to make room for Cannon. Marcuse Feb 25 #25
Can Scotus revisit the immunity thing? vapor2 Feb 25 #27
;-{)..... Goonch Feb 25 #28
SC justices are not for or against tRump per se BWdem4life Feb 25 #30
Furious Trump wants 'rehearing' after 'highly disappointing' Supreme Court defeat LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Supreme Court justices s...»Reply #32