Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(113,569 posts)
14. That is a reasonable argument to make. Not prejudging a vote that is still largely early votes and excludes
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 10:27 PM
15 hrs ago

the largest population center that favors one of the candidates when the vote is this close (59% based still on low counts of same day votes) as many on this thread are doing. Given the court stay, it is unlikely to be settled until tomorrow.

And no, the comment about the betting markets was based on another post in this thread.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

With only 50% of the vote in and a court stay issued in the three leading stronghold counties (including Dallas County) hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #1
Talarico is at 99 cents in predictions market. DemocratSinceBirth 15 hrs ago #2
Well, alrightee. Why even vote? Just let the gamblers decide for us. hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #3
I report. You decide. People have already voted. DemocratSinceBirth 15 hrs ago #7
Pray tell, why are YOU "disappointed?" hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #10
Because I wasn't first to call it DemocratSinceBirth 15 hrs ago #12
Being "first' can make one a jackass when wrong. Not saying he will be but there is that risk. hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #15
Definitely not over yet, but Talarico has a strong edge calguy 15 hrs ago #4
I am agnostic either way. I'd take either. But, I detest this desire to ignore the election hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #5
I couldn't care less about the 'betting market' calguy 15 hrs ago #11
That is a reasonable argument to make. Not prejudging a vote that is still largely early votes and excludes hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #14
No one is saying not to count the votes, just that looking at the votes counted, he may win karynnj 14 hrs ago #24
Wasserman's usual "I have seen enough" is just that and foolish as hell in this case. hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #25
I hope that if Talarico ends up with over 50 percent of the vote, karynnj 14 hrs ago #28
Yes. It would be great if both candidates plus Dem chairman could get together hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #29
Prognosticators are either right or wrong. Happy Hoosier 14 hrs ago #30
Duh.... hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #34
I agree that it may be too early karynnj 15 hrs ago #21
He made this projection hours ago. hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #22
It's over Boo1 15 hrs ago #6
Talarico got 70% of Latino votes. ananda 15 hrs ago #8
No. It is not and won't be until tomorrow. This is almost all early voting and not same day... hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #9
Dallas is 2/3 in now Boo1 15 hrs ago #17
We shall see. Again, so many tonight are citing one pollster (and the betting markets) in total hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #18
Time will tell, but she has consistently under-performed in early vote. pat_k 15 hrs ago #20
I am not saying she will win. But, there is enough up-in-the air in this problematic election hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #23
Of course. pat_k 14 hrs ago #27
And if the projections are correct? Happy Hoosier 14 hrs ago #31
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. i have no pick in this race if that is your insinuation. hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #33
No... i just don't understand your butthurt. Happy Hoosier 13 hrs ago #35
Stop accusing me of such nonsense. I attacked no one. In a 50:50 proposition, projections are not hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #36
it also has not been perceived well that she jumped in the race so late Skittles 14 hrs ago #26
Dewey Wins! Liberal In Texas 15 hrs ago #13
Yes. The ghost of Truman might (just "might") get the last laugh.... hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #16
Still to early, but Crockett under-performed Dallas county benchmark pat_k 15 hrs ago #19
If anyone wants some good news: markodochartaigh 14 hrs ago #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've seen enough: James T...»Reply #14