Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've seen enough: James Talarico (D) wins the #TXSEN Dem primary. [View all]hlthe2b
(113,557 posts)25. Wasserman's usual "I have seen enough" is just that and foolish as hell in this case.
This is going to be lawsuit city, given it is now coming out that the R planned manipulation from a county-wide election to precinct based was accompanied by invalid/incorrect precinct maps and erroneous information on the voter websites. That this overwhelmingly impacts Dallas County is the issue. This is going to be a total clusterfuck and all the projected breakdown of votes remaining, votes, counted, votes predicted, votes assumed most likely won't change that until the courts decide what to do with this mess. Can the State Supreme Court just rule they don't give a damn and throw out the votes placed between 7-9PM and ignore everything else? Well, it is Texas, so yes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've seen enough: James Talarico (D) wins the #TXSEN Dem primary. [View all]
In It to Win It
14 hrs ago
OP
With only 50% of the vote in and a court stay issued in the three leading stronghold counties (including Dallas County)
hlthe2b
14 hrs ago
#1
Being "first' can make one a jackass when wrong. Not saying he will be but there is that risk.
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#15
I am agnostic either way. I'd take either. But, I detest this desire to ignore the election
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#5
That is a reasonable argument to make. Not prejudging a vote that is still largely early votes and excludes
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#14
No one is saying not to count the votes, just that looking at the votes counted, he may win
karynnj
13 hrs ago
#24
Wasserman's usual "I have seen enough" is just that and foolish as hell in this case.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#25
Yes. It would be great if both candidates plus Dem chairman could get together
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#29
No. It is not and won't be until tomorrow. This is almost all early voting and not same day...
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#9
We shall see. Again, so many tonight are citing one pollster (and the betting markets) in total
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#18
I am not saying she will win. But, there is enough up-in-the air in this problematic election
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#23
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. i have no pick in this race if that is your insinuation.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#33