Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pat_k

(13,184 posts)

1. Don't forget, they assured courts there was no need for a stay because refunds wouldn't be an issue.

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Fri Mar 6, 2026, 07:42 PM

Friday

Courts REALLY don't like being lied to.

And that particular lie was repeated in filing after filing... assurances that a stay was unnecessary to prevent harms because plaintiffs would be made whole if tariffs were struck down (which is actually crap because the rippling harms go beyond the dollar value, but that's another matter).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

republianmushroom 2naSalit

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump has the power to do anything--except pay back tariffs, apparently [View all] applegrove Friday OP

Don't forget, they assured courts there was no need for a stay because refunds wouldn't be an issue. pat_k Friday #1

Fuck that fat piece of shit Blue Owl Friday #2

Better cough it up, Donnie... 2naSalit Friday #3

well, SonOfNebanaube Friday #4