Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,493 posts)
6. Lots of reasons.
Sat Mar 7, 2026, 08:59 AM
Saturday

Some go back a few years, with all the PR about how we were selling old stock to Ukraine and we'd be sure to put the billions of $s into ordering a ton more munitions to replace them--Patriot missiles, THAAD munitions, artillery, etc., etc.

Except that barely happened. Even in Britain the huge upsurge in munitions production still has barely started, what with environmental impact studies, regulations, etc., etc. Then again, it's only been 4 years and you know, nothing fast happens during war.

But the not-so-old PR about replacing aging munitions reflected the fact that the peace dividend meant we didn't replace munitions as they aged. And the ageing never stops. So there.

Then there's the need to replace those munitions lost during combat in Syria, let's say, fighting ISIS, or even in Afghanistan. Some were replaced but slowly.

Then there's the much greater (no, not really ... ) drawdown of munitions under the current operation. Or the drawdown last summer, perhaps.

But a lot of people only can think there's only ever possibly one reason for anything.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump: "We increased Orde...»Reply #6