Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

EarlG

(23,680 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 09:38 AM Mar 12

A reminder to all DUers reposting content from social media: Check your sources [View all]

Given the situation in the Middle East, it's understandable that people want to bring the most up-to-date information they can find to DU. In principle, I'm absolutely not opposed to that. In practice, however, it means that some of the content now being brought to DU is being reposted from sources which are not appropriate for our community.

I am talking about social media sources which traffic in right-wing content, racist content, homophobic content, antisemitic content, and conspiracy content, including anti-vax conspiracy theories. Or, more often than not, all of the above.

I will note that DU's "Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources" rule does carve out an exception for such sources:

Do not post right-wing talking points or smears. Do not post content sourced from right-wing publications, authors, or pundits. Exceptions are permitted if you provide a clear reason for doing so that is consistent with the values of this website.

Note that if you want to use a source which would typically be considered inappropriate for DU, you need to to give a clear reason for why you're doing it. If the purpose is to point out that MAGA media is turning against Trump, or if you want to highlight the awfulness of a particular X post by some right-wing public figure, then you need to give a clear explanation that that is your intent.

But simply reposting content from neo-Nazi or other extremist social media accounts, just because they've criticized Trump or other Republicans, or because they've posted an update about the war with Iran, does NOT count under the rule exception.

As you know, DU relies on the community to police itself via the Jury system. Of course, not all members serving on Juries are aware of whether certain X accounts are inappropriate, and people are often not likely to bother to check. This can make it easy for inappropriate sources to slip through. If Jury members see a post bashing Trump or Republicans, they are probably likely to think it's okay, and will be unlikely to click through to the X account only to find that it is selling white supremacist T-shirts.

So:

1) To DU members who are reposting content from social media: Please check your sources before posting to make sure that the source is appropriate for DU.

2) To DU members who are serving on Juries for the "Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources" rule: Please don't just assume that a social media source is okay if it is bashing Trump -- actually check the source to make sure that it is appropriate for DU. If you do not wish to click through to a social media site to check the source, it is perfectly okay to cancel out of the Jury and let someone else take a look.

Thanks for reading, and for being part of the effort to keep DU clear of bigoted sources and content.
77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for the clarification, EarlG UpInArms Mar 12 #1
Also, just stop posting content from the Nazi bar on DU. demmiblue Mar 12 #2
Yup, I would love no inks to Twitter at all obamanut2012 Mar 12 #10
I won't click on any links to X. CaptainTruth Mar 12 #12
I put people who constantly post X content on ignore. demmiblue Mar 12 #15
I do that too. hunter Mar 12 #58
Same here. niyad Mar 12 #20
It's still the largest hub for news and commentary leftstreet Mar 12 #18
I don't think that is true anymore, sans the extreme right-wing content. demmiblue Mar 12 #26
That's great there's another source n/t leftstreet Mar 12 #28
It's also the best source for breaking financial and overseas news jmbar2 Mar 12 #37
It is. Blue Sky is mostly a US thing. LeftInTX Mar 12 #65
Everyone??? ShazzieB Mar 12 #61
I go for breaking news. When we bombed Iran, I was on Flight Radar until Iran jammed the radars. LeftInTX Mar 12 #66
Thanks Earl Nittersing Mar 12 #3
I wish the Democracy Now! posts could be murielm99 Mar 12 #4
That is a bit unfair jfz9580m Mar 12 #34
disagree Kali Mar 12 #55
I can not believe attacking democracy now is allowed here questionseverything Mar 12 #57
Democracy Now attacks Democrats! LeftInTX Mar 12 #67
It's a news show, letting people hear from lesser candidates on the ballot is what the news should do questionseverything Mar 12 #68
They do. And they constantly bash Democrats. LeftInTX Mar 12 #70
Democracy Now is kind of like how the evening news used to be AZProgressive Mar 12 #74
Not during the 2024 election. All they did was bash the Democrats. LeftInTX Mar 12 #76
Thanks, EarlG. greatauntoftriplets Mar 12 #5
K&R PatSeg Mar 12 #6
Thanks EarlG MustLoveBeagles Mar 12 #7
there has to be a "but" GusBob Mar 12 #8
Do you have specific examples in mind? niyad Mar 12 #11
because of course it NEVER happens ... stopdiggin Mar 12 #23
So asking for specific examples is denying the truth of the poster's niyad Mar 12 #24
No. but it IS often a tactic used to nullify, diminish or dismiss ... stopdiggin Mar 12 #31
I see. So showing where **I** have made such posts would be something niyad Mar 12 #39
"having accused me of such .. " stopdiggin Mar 12 #71
If it both takes you that long to find one example and is not worth your time to do so... W_HAMILTON Mar 12 #44
and 'rampant' was never mentioned, or really even implied, in either the post I replied to stopdiggin Mar 12 #72
So asking for specific examples is denying the truth of the poster's niyad Mar 12 #25
Yes I do GusBob Mar 12 #40
Not a problem. I simply wondered what I might have missed in the niyad Mar 12 #43
Don't fret wolfie001 Mar 12 #62
Thank you, EarlG. Sadly, the list of trusted, reliable, ethical sources niyad Mar 12 #9
Roger that orangecrush Mar 12 #13
I never click on an X posting... MiHale Mar 12 #14
Actually, on each X post, you can click on Grok symbol to check womanofthehills Mar 12 #47
Is there a list of inimical sites for us naive jurors? dickthegrouch Mar 12 #16
I think he was talking about right wing sources ON some social media sites Kali Mar 12 #56
Problem is Independent journalists womanofthehills Mar 12 #73
yeah that is the beauty/"problem" with the jury system Kali Mar 12 #75
KnR Alice Kramden Mar 12 #17
It is getting much harder to tell truth from lies. BlueKota Mar 12 #19
"It is getting much harder to tell truth from lies." True Dough Mar 12 #30
Agreed! BlueKota Mar 12 #42
To be clear, and this is also addressed to one of the posts above, EarlG Mar 12 #32
A little confusing. LiberalLovinLug Mar 12 #60
The latter EarlG Mar 12 #64
Got it thanks! LiberalLovinLug Mar 13 #77
You can click on Grok symbol on every X post womanofthehills Mar 12 #48
💯 💯 💯 💯 SSJVegeta Mar 12 #21
K&R Gets more important every day to maintain integrity...nt Wounded Bear Mar 12 #22
Thank you, EarlG!! nt PunkinPi Mar 12 #27
Thank you... This is my favorite place to get the latest news stories from all over the net.. Peacetrain Mar 12 #29
Thank you, EarlG. sueh Mar 12 #33
Please use in an appropriate forum too Marthe48 Mar 12 #35
I verify most posts these days. Lots of clickbait. lindysalsagal Mar 12 #36
Thanks... 2naSalit Mar 12 #38
Most DUers have no desire to provide extra clicks to the right-wing media FakeNoose Mar 12 #41
Problem I've had in past womanofthehills Mar 12 #49
Always be sure the source is identified in your post FakeNoose Mar 12 #52
This sounds like Twitter/X in general: LudwigPastorius Mar 12 #45
Great to see this. Some of the sites have really offensive content, not just political but dehumanizing. JudyM Mar 12 #46
Here's a new tidbit. usonian Mar 12 #50
When you say "that site", it would be useful to specify which of the 2 sites you mention you are talking about muriel_volestrangler Mar 12 #54
K pwb Mar 12 #51
I'll stick with 'social media reposts are sloppy and lazy' and ignore them unless Torchlight Mar 12 #53
I see a lot of that from "the usual suspects" Skittles Mar 12 #59
Thank You for the PSA, EarlG... Cha Mar 12 #63
Thanks for the reminder, EarlG. B.See Mar 12 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A reminder to all DUers r...