Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,261 posts)
59. jfc
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 02:22 PM
Monday

....this shit again.

Dems=failure.

That's essentially his message. That's what will be conveyed.

It's goddamn bullshit.

The 'generational' crap is belied by the way seasoned Democrats have repeatedly and consistently produced for the people in the majority. THAT should be the message, but instead we have this navelgazing crap that supposes we've done nothing at all. Where the fuck was he when we were passing historic legislation in the Biden term with Chuck Schumer as majority leader?

Why kick the party when we're down? NOT ONE ELECTED DEMOCRAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAST ELECTION LOSSES.

Those elected Dems he's pushing off of here have actually fought and WON against republicans. Posturing as if there's something wrong with them because some younger candidate didn't do the same is just sophistry; a specious and self-defeating argument, especially making it at the behest of one of the worst media demagogues in the business.

Just BRILLIANT politics displayed here by Booker basically taking a cue from Welker to trash Dems, I tell ya.

We EXCEL in the majority, USHERING IN HISTORIC PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATIVE CHANGE and are limited in the minority to making statements LIKE THIS.

You'd think people would be self aware and recognize that this is nothing but anti-Democratic messaging; screeds that are exploited by trolls on social media everyday.

But here we are with another person posturing as if he's better than everyone else in the party that's fighting the same battles and wants the very same things he does, as badly as he does, and acting as if anti-Democratic party messaging is some sort of political genius or some sort of political rallying call for voters.

It's just not. It reads and sounds like someone who hasn't yet achieved what he's exhorting everyone else to do, and is acting as if he's above it all. It's just a turn-off.

It's even more ridiculous supposing he's primed to say something that hasn't already been said; or is poised to put on some political performance that's going to change a vote among the people he works with.

Just grandstanding and pushing off on his own party as if he had actually done something to coalesce and organize the coalition of elected Democrats that we have now and is ready to present a workable coalition to advance legislation (which is what he's basically complaining about, or should be); or that his words represent something other than his own projections.

That performative spiel should be reserved for the actual republican opposition. And anyone taking comfort in this should check and see just how many voters have been encouraged by this TO SUPPORT THE PARTY AT ELECTION TIME.

Because that's virtually ALL he's done here is project counterproductive nonsense about Democrats, and helped normalize the bullshit notion presented here by Welker about 'purity tests,' whatever that means to that inveterate cipher for her news org's bullshit takes-of-the-day against Democrats.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Please find this Dem another candidate. Thank you. efhmc Monday #1
Agreed BaronChocula Monday #45
Agree WiVoter Monday #57
There is no "right" there is only MAGA BeyondGeography Monday #2
Really! Cory Has Nowhere to Go .. He Is the Embodiment of the Left MAGA Hates! TearsOfDaClowned Monday #6
"MAGA's" dream opponent is a technocrat. A real "adult in the room". David__77 Monday #8
He's right. Democrats don't need purity tests SocialDemocrat61 Monday #3
Poppycock NoRethugFriends Monday #9
Thanks for sharing SocialDemocrat61 Monday #13
Care to Elaborate? quakerboy Monday #50
So Gore, Clinton and Harris SocialDemocrat61 Monday #51
Yes quakerboy 20 hrs ago #80
How so? SocialDemocrat61 20 hrs ago #82
You first. quakerboy 20 hrs ago #83
So you don't have an answer SocialDemocrat61 19 hrs ago #86
Bookmarking. n/t rzemanfl Monday #52
Phony issue, sounds like he is trying out to run the "Problem Solvers Caucus". displacedvermoter Monday #4
any Roosevelt out there? Tetrachloride Monday #5
DURec leftstreet Monday #7
Cory needs to work on messaging - TBF Monday #10
Just lost my vote kacekwl Monday #11
That's literal for me because I'm in his state. JHB Monday #41
You've just proved his point! MorbidButterflyTat Monday #58
Purity tests may be necessary gulliver Monday #12
Just found one in Nebraska. Blue Full Moon Monday #16
People who administer purity tests are gatekeepers gulliver Monday #30
Post removed Post removed Monday #14
An example of a "purity test." question everything Monday #17
That's not a win for democrats it's a win for republicans. Blue Full Moon Monday #20
Booker is pretty damn far down the list of problematic senators. W_HAMILTON Monday #29
Looks like he is failing, last ditch effort by running for president. Blue Full Moon Monday #22
I'll bet a good number of dems do. Blame the system. CrispyQ Monday #32
I was impressed by him recently on Sunday Morning question everything Monday #15
Yeah yeah Cory LR3 Monday #18
I don't get it. Could you please elaborate, LR3? Thanks ❤️ littlemissmartypants Monday #38
It is part of a famous skit LR3 Monday #47
Got it. Thanks. ❤️👋 littlemissmartypants Monday #48
Piggy and the MAGAts MorbidButterflyTat Monday #60
By "this point" I mean LR3 Monday #70
Isn't Cory Booker the "bland milquetoast" (your words) guy who gave the 25 hour speech lapucelle Yesterday #73
The same Cory Booker that sat in a protest action on the Capitol steps regarding Republican budget plans, Autumn 23 hrs ago #74
Do you know why Cory Booker voted to confirm Charles Kushner? lapucelle 22 hrs ago #75
I really don't care why he did it. He voted to confirm a felon. A felon family member Autumn 22 hrs ago #76
"I really don't care why he did it" says it all. lapucelle 21 hrs ago #77
Purity my ass. There's the right thing to do and the wrong thing to do. Autumn 20 hrs ago #78
My goodness, that certainly sounds like an in-group out-group dichotomy predicated on arbitrary boundaries. lapucelle 20 hrs ago #79
What snappy rejoinder is next? "Dichotomy my ass"? lapucelle 20 hrs ago #81
Exactly the purity test. Emotional polarization. betsuni 19 hrs ago #87
I think "purity test" is a slur aimed at principled protection of marginalized peoples. LuvLoogie Monday #19
100% then what they pass is all republican ideology. Blue Full Moon Monday #23
+1 leftstreet Monday #62
You're right, because there are other "putity tests" that are very real although they don't get that label JHB Yesterday #71
JFC, this better not be an early call for reconciliation without accountablity. intheflow Monday #21
+1000 Celerity Monday #25
+1 leftstreet Monday #61
The one issue that (ALMOST) everyone ignores. The insane concentration of wealth. usonian Monday #24
Strange Cirsium Monday #26
Ugh Lemon Lyman Monday #27
2012 MTP: shilling for private equity/Romney against Obama Jmg212 Monday #28
I agree with Booker, partially. gab13by13 Monday #31
Democrats "fail" when they get sucked into the divisive purity test bullshit and don't vote "D" in the general election. sop Monday #33
I would argue we have to find a happy middle angrychair Monday #39
Do you believe Republican Senator Mehmet Oz would be better than Fetterman? sop Monday #55
Fetterman's crime angrychair Monday #65
Despite Fetterman's "crime," do you you think Senator Oz would be any better? It's a simple question. sop Monday #66
My pushback is entirely primary angrychair Monday #69
Cory would not be my choice. JBTaurus83 Monday #34
Murphy and Beshear are strong candidates. yellow dahlia Monday #46
We tried that, Corey. His name was Barack Obama. All it proved was that there's no "left-right divide"... JHB Monday #35
best post of the thread harumph Monday #37
The football example! 😎 littlemissmartypants Monday #43
Hard no from me angrychair Monday #36
That's what real leadership looks like. everyonematters Monday #40
Instead of purity tests, how about impurity tests? hay rick Monday #42
What's CB talking about today? What will he do tomorrow? littlemissmartypants Monday #44
There is no issue more important and necessary... Escape Monday #49
I like Booker themaguffin Monday #53
Spoken like a true centrist. Buddyzbuddy Monday #54
Senator Booker isn't a *dreaded* "centrist". Based on his voting record, he's a hard core liberal, lapucelle 20 hrs ago #84
I almost miss "establishment" as a mindless slur because centrist means something and can be verified. betsuni 19 hrs ago #88
I have no personal animosity towards Sen. Booker. Buddyzbuddy 8 hrs ago #89
Yes!!! We need a FIGHTER!!! We need someone to stand on the senate floor speaking for 25 hours ... lapucelle 20 hrs ago #85
"Asked by NBC anchor Kristen Welker MorbidButterflyTat Monday #56
Yup, failed the purity test by saying purity tests are bad. Purity tests turn allies into enemies betsuni Yesterday #72
jfc bigtree Monday #59
What a great idea, Cory. Trash the Democrats rather than the Republicans. Please . . . don't run in 2028. Vinca Monday #63
The Republicans have failed KT2000 Monday #64
Why is it always the democrats who are failing? Trump fucked up big time, so did Mike Johnson. Initech Monday #67
Ugh spanone Monday #68
The primary is absolutely a purity test. Buddyzbuddy 8 hrs ago #90
After reading the comments above, I'm thinking that B.See 3 hrs ago #91
"Closest match in the Primaries"--good way to put it. DFW 2 hrs ago #92
Voting is like getting on a public bus. The bus will never pick you up at your door and drop you Scrivener7 38 min ago #93
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Booker: Democratic Party ...»Reply #59