Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should Eric Swalwell drop out of the California gubernatorial race? [View all]LonePirate
(14,375 posts)18. That's bullshit. Due process has nothing to do with it and it is not being thrown out the window.
Let Swalwell have his day in court. If he is found innocent, then he can run in 2030. Until then, he should not be running any sort of campaign as these allegations distract from his message/campaign and they tarnish the image of the party as a whole. Frankly, it boils down to whether you believe his accusers (women) or him.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Should Eric Swalwell drop out of the California gubernatorial race? [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 11
OP
Absolutely not. This stinks of repuke rat fuckery, imo. Phone numbers can be pretty easily spoofed.
SheltieLover
Apr 11
#1
So the republicans planted operatives on Swallwell's staff for *six* years?
Fiendish Thingy
Apr 11
#29
He had a solid shot at winning the nomination. If the GOP was going to fuck him over, why now?
Jedi Guy
Apr 11
#90
We cannot be the party that speaks out against Trump's harassment claims while turning a blind eye to Swalwell's.
LonePirate
Apr 11
#11
That's bullshit. Due process has nothing to do with it and it is not being thrown out the window.
LonePirate
Apr 11
#18
If doing the right thing is akin to falling into a trap for you, then we have different morals and viewpoints.
LonePirate
Apr 11
#49
but you will admit that people that DO possess morals - might have difficulty
stopdiggin
Apr 11
#103
Unfortunately (because not a big, big fan) the removal of Swalwell leaves behind
stopdiggin
Apr 11
#10
It would probably be disadvantageous for the Democratic Party if he were to do so
David__77
Apr 11
#16
His own comment in his statement that his wrongdoing is between him and his wife answers it for me.
Scrivener7
Apr 11
#84
Ms. Luna should clean up her own house first & impeach the adjudicated rapist.
SheltieLover
Apr 11
#33
How many times have you used that term in the last day? Just letting you know I'm tired of reading it
pattyloutwo
Apr 11
#87
No. I think the better option is to call out the objectionable and/or obnoxious.
stopdiggin
Apr 11
#106
Now you're getting it! And OTHER people have every right to voice disagreement
stopdiggin
Sunday
#115
It depends on the evidence. The woman said there were messages and photos. Let's see them.
Vinca
Apr 11
#41
Hearsay. I'm not saying Swalwell didn't do it, I'm just thinking Democrats shouldn't go all Al Franken immediately.
Vinca
Apr 11
#47
If he's innocent as he says he is he should immediately sue the accusers and demand they produce
in2herbs
Apr 11
#44
Now we want to compare ourselves to the worst??? No, we need to uphold our own standards.
Pisces
Apr 11
#79
Whether you're Swalwell or anyone else in politics, it comes down to how honest you are with yourself.
Passages
Apr 11
#62
Yes, he should drop out. We don't need this damaging distraction from Democratic messaging. We don't need Republicans
Doodley
Apr 11
#74