Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatrickforB

(15,533 posts)
19. Well, Mamdani is in New York City, and the urban areas are generally well supplied with
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 02:15 PM
Apr 16

hospitals, ambulatory care centers and residential nursing centers.

There are a number of factors hurting healthcare staffing levels in rural settings. First is the heavy student debt load for doctors. According to Educationdata.org,

As of late 2025, the average medical school debt for new graduates is approximately $216,659 to $234,597. When including undergraduate loans, total debt often approaches or exceeds $246,000. Approximately 70%–74% of medical students graduate with debt, with a median of $200,000 for medical school alone
.

Now that is nearly a mortgage payment. This, coupled with the fact that most medical providers in rural America get most of their revenue by billing Medicaid, the cuts in the so-called big beautiful bill are in the process of forcing many rural healthcare organizations to close. Not because of no need but because of financial pressures imposed by predatory student debt and Wall Street's insatiable quest for shareholder profits in healthcare insurance, for profit providers and big pharma.

This is a serious issue that is exacerbated by the Citizens United ruling and the corporate corruption that has bought much of our Congress. The Republicans don't even pretend to care about this, and many of the institutional Democrats will not move on the issue for fear of primary opponents heavily funded by the lobbies. Dollars are the 'voice' of corporations, which are people according to our current policy structure.

Now, with $39 trillion in national debt incurred mostly by Republicans, the US government has been declared insolvent. This is because of the Chicago School trickle down economic theory which Reagan took to the White House in 1981. When he took power, and Congress started slashing taxes for corporations, the narrative was that lower taxes would stimulate corporations to create more jobs, and the payroll tax contributions of the new workers would more than offset the permanently lowered corporate tax rates.

Thus, we see, if we think critically about this for a moment, that the burden of funding our government, ostensibly 'of, by and for' the people, has moved from 1970s levels, when corporations contributed around 35% of the tax revenue and individual taxpayers like us paid in around 45%. Now, individual taxpayers pay in around 85% and corporations only 9%.

So we see that the government, due to corporate corruption, no longer collects enough money to fund programs that actually help working Americans at their kitchen tables. This is why Trump thinks we can afford a billion a day on a war of choice while cutting services for us right and left.

This problem could by solved by:
- Taxing billionaires out of existance
- Raising taxes on corporations back to 1970 levels
- Changing the rules of corporate governance to a stakeholder model rather than holding profits above all else

This is why I like Mamdani so much. He is thinking outside the box to solve this Wall Street problem because he has essentially 'nationalized' the food store industry.

And don't be fooled when our corporate owned media and the Republicans call him a commie. Wall Street has a long history of driving imperialistic behavior on the part of our government. We have gone into a number of countries that tried to nationalize industries so they could give their people a fair shake, and done regime changes. Take Iran in 1953, for example. Our CIA put Pahlavi in power because the democratically elected ruler of Iran wanted to nationalize industries. Can't have that!

We did the same thing with a number of countries in central and south America as well as the Pacific Rim. This is called imperialism and the American Empire was in there slugging starting in the 19th century. After we took over the British Raj in 1946, it took less than 20 years for the military industrial complex (MIC) Ike warned us about in his Guns and Butter speech in the early sixties to take over. After the assassination of JFK in 1963, they got LBJ to send 500K Americans over to Vietnam. The motive for the MIC, of course, was profits, and the government spent today's equivalent of nearly a trillion dollars on that war. 58,000 American kids were killed, and 3.2 million Vietnamese dies.

Again, this is what imperialism and shareholder primacy capitalism looks like. This is why the 1971 essay known as the Powell Manifesto called for the Republicans to take over the political nomination process. The purpose there was to send candidates to local, state and national elections that would vote in favor of business interests, i.e. tax cuts, deregulation, privatization and gutting any government programs besides defense and national security.

This is what we have. AOC, Bernie, Mamdani and other progressives know this and this is why they are all reported on by the corporate media as being 'far left radical' or 'far left liberal.' They are not. Wall Street just doesn't like them.

I'll leave you with a joke from the old Soviet Union: A Russian and an American were talking. The American commented on how sophisticated the Soviet propaganda apparatus was. The Russian replied, "Our system of propaganda is not nearly as sophisticated as yours!"

The American looked quizzically at the Russian and said, "What do you mean? We don't have propaganda here!"

The Russian smiled, and said, "See what I mean?"

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Huh. So... he's... delivering on promises? mr715 Apr 16 #1
Promises made promises kept baby! Glaisne Apr 17 #48
Non-profit social services. Great. Hope that reaches into healthcare, too. lindysalsagal Apr 16 #2
Which doctors would work those jobs ? JI7 Apr 16 #4
I think we might be surprised. It has long been contended by Wall Street financiers that PatrickforB Apr 16 #6
I agree 100%. Great post. Passages Apr 16 #12
But aren't they already having trouble getting doctors to open up in rural JI7 Apr 16 #15
Being paid decently is an incentive. Festivito Apr 16 #18
Well, Mamdani is in New York City, and the urban areas are generally well supplied with PatrickforB Apr 16 #19
Absolutely! Additional considerations pat_k Apr 16 #38
But, nothing has stopped them from correcting this. OldBaldy1701E Apr 17 #49
Proprietary studies NJCher Apr 17 #53
They'd get paid leftstreet Apr 16 #7
Depends on what the salary is, doesn't it? MichMan Apr 17 #54
It's not always about the money. Jedi Guy Apr 16 #14
I'm sure there might be a few . But being realistic JI7 Apr 16 #16
I don't disagree at all. Nonprofits don't always have the resources, unfortunately. Jedi Guy Apr 16 #27
That is a long-established model. yardwork Apr 16 #11
NYC has a very robust clinic system IbogaProject Apr 16 #37
Salaried doctors works well for both Deminpenn Apr 17 #57
European countries do this. We're late to the party, here... CTyankee Apr 16 #3
We have been late for so long. It's great to see a shift. Passages Apr 16 #5
Late To Every Party, From World Wars To Healthcare To.... ColoringFool Apr 16 #29
We seem to be late to the party quite often. llmart Apr 17 #50
I think some Americans have been awakened when/if they go to a European country (like on a cruise ship) and see what CTyankee Apr 17 #52
DURec leftstreet Apr 16 #8
This is why there was so much opposition to Mamdami from the rich elite during the mayoral election. They weren't Fil1957 Apr 16 #9
Exactly right. Their fear: the public at large seeing for themselves the success of these initiatives. Passages Apr 16 #13
Precisely! SheltieLover Apr 16 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Apr 16 #10
Damn shame Mamdani is ineligible to run for president. Emile Apr 16 #17
He could be a Senator for life... mr715 Apr 16 #22
Grocery store profit margins are historically very low MichMan Apr 16 #20
I think its a form of.... reACTIONary Apr 16 #23
Not according to the article the OP linked to (not the tweet) Nittersing Apr 16 #33
Somehow Aldis seems to manage without property and rent relief. Ms. Toad Apr 16 #25
Private contractors will operate them madville Apr 16 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Apr 16 #45
There are a little over 11,000 grocery stores .... reACTIONary Apr 16 #21
As a 43-year resident of NYC . . . markpkessinger Apr 16 #24
+1 leftstreet Apr 16 #26
Thanks for the info. Ritabert Apr 16 #28
What, in your understanding, would constitute success? And.. reACTIONary Apr 16 #30
Whether it's 5,000 or 11,000 . . . markpkessinger Apr 16 #40
Yes, and I can't be certain what the state of NY.... reACTIONary Apr 16 #44
I'm lucky in that I live in a well-served neighborhood . . . markpkessinger Apr 17 #55
Great answer orangecrush Apr 17 #47
How City-Owned Grocery Stores Can Tackle Food Insecurity Passages Apr 16 #31
The point is not adding stores at this time; it's showing how city-owned stores might work. WhiskeyGrinder Apr 16 #36
The city won't be running it madville Apr 16 #43
yeah I misspoke WhiskeyGrinder Apr 16 #46
Tried that Rebl2 Apr 16 #34
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 16 #35
Is there a PDF or web page with complete details? gulliver Apr 16 #39
Here you go Shipwack Apr 17 #51
I was looking for a specific plan gulliver Apr 17 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Apr 16 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mayor Mamdani:Last year, ...»Reply #19