Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(2,962 posts)
4. I don't think that's a difficult question
Sat Apr 18, 2026, 03:50 PM
Saturday

The exact limits can always be negotiated, but if there is a wealth tax, I think $50million per household would be a sensible entry point at a modest level and accelerating sharply above the billion dollar mark. A 2% net worth tax above a billion dollars makes good sense. IOW, a person with $1bn in net worth would pay $20M every year and would never miss any of it. If they did decline below $1Bn in net worth, then their share would go down, so none of them would ever feel any pain.

As far as income tax, put it back where it was in 1960 when our middle class was healthy. A high top marginal rate ENCOURAGES investment because investments in your business and work force are deductible. The top bracket in 1960 was 91%. Nobody ever paid that because they did reinvest in their businesses and work force. But a few people did pay 50-60% and that's fine. Keep in mind they only pay that high rate on the topmost part of their income. Even a person reaching the 91% bracket is probably paying only a 50% effective rate.

And let's stop playing pillow fights about Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Remove all the caps on that. A billionaire should pay the full rate just like everybody else. And that will EASILY fund Medicare for all and keep Social Security solvent through the end of this century.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Start with average income vs median income.. I'm willing to negotiate from there ck4829 Saturday #1
Progressive or graduated taxes Cirsium Saturday #2
I think the problem is that the "wealth" of the ultra wealthy Bettie Saturday #23
I Need To See Data... ProfessorGAC Sunday #38
Tax the wealthy like you want to drown them in a bathtub. bucolic_frolic Saturday #3
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Saturday #21
I don't think that's a difficult question Bluetus Saturday #4
I'm a big fan of a wealth tax... WarGamer Saturday #9
Maybe... The Revolution Saturday #15
10m wealth... that's a lot of house and assets. and 0.3% on 10m wealth is just 30k tax WarGamer Saturday #17
The people with $10M of net worth are not the problem in our society Bluetus Saturday #25
Wealth Tax isn't punishment lol... WarGamer Saturday #30
We should set a high bar. I agree with you. Bluetus Saturday #32
I have no problems with billionaires... they just need to pay up! WarGamer Sunday #34
I don't have envy of those who work hard and are successful because of it Bluetus Sunday #37
We'll know that when we finish. -misanthroptimist Saturday #5
Start at the top income...work your way down... ret5hd Saturday #6
How is it defined when giving out TAX CUTS?! leftstreet Saturday #7
$400k was the last dividing line... WarGamer Saturday #8
In income, not net worth. NutmegYankee Saturday #10
For the wealth tax... I'll start taxing families and individuals at $10M WarGamer Saturday #11
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Saturday #16
I'm only referring to personal wealth... the farm should be an LLC WarGamer Saturday #18
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Saturday #19
Every billionaire will suddenly put all their money into an LLC tinrobot Saturday #24
I think something can be worked out for family farms which was the example. WarGamer Saturday #31
And what if Superman was a Nazi? dpibel Saturday #33
Top down, and I'll let you know when we get there. Iggo Saturday #12
How was it done under Eisenhower? thucythucy Saturday #13
I'm thinking you need to include any income asset or investment, haele Saturday #14
This message was self-deleted by its author. demmiblue Saturday #20
"...taxing of inherited wealth in excess of $1 million." IMO, stupid. flvegan Saturday #22
Agreed ... That's too low a number. Personal story JT45242 Saturday #28
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Saturday #29
Varies by kind of tax... JT45242 Saturday #26
How many... ZDU Saturday #27
I am a TSP Millionaire DenaliDemocrat Sunday #35
Bill Clinton taxed the wealthy. Maybe see how he did that and Nixie Sunday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When we get back into pow...»Reply #4