Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(131,430 posts)
4. For now, all we can do is take a careful look at both the content and the source.
Mon Apr 20, 2026, 04:12 PM
Apr 20

If the source is some obscure purveyor of videos seeking likes and clicks, and it contains material that looks either too slick or too cartoonish, assume it's AI. There are videos on YouTube and elsewhere that purport to be by Rachel Maddow and other well-known cable tv hosts that seem fairly real - using their voices and images, though sometimes the voices are too fast - but a real Maddow video will have the MS NOW logo, and these don't. If the video doesn't come from a known source and it looks slick or artificial it's AI. We are seeing a lot of elaborate cartoon-like "artwork" that is obviously AI. If something purports to be an actual photograph, it's usually too shiny; also, look for weird shadows and shapes, extra fingers or impossible overlays of objects. Be discerning. Don't post something just because you think it's clever. AI steals the images and the intellectual property of real people and churns it into crap.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #4