Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nixie

(18,049 posts)
36. In your uninformed opinion and your own personal extrapolations.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 05:22 PM
2 hrs ago

""Asked why he did not use his congressional campaign committee as a benchmark to estimate maintenance costs for his state account, Becerra said he was focused on ensuring he was not violating federal law or ethics guidelines barring him from campaigning.
"I had to make sure I stayed distanced from all campaign or politically-related activity. So I asked Sean to make sure we could take care of it.

Hope that helps, and please do move on. Your views do not match what the case documents say and the amounts involved wouldn't raise a flag in the way you insist that would involve judgment. Most thoughtful voters do know this. The investigators did, which is why Becerra wasn't implicated.

Hope that helps, and please do move on.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's not as actively vocal against Silicon Valley Tech Bros as I'd like. haele Tuesday #1
Thanks cally Tuesday #3
IIRC, Becerra was looked at as a possible running oasis Tuesday #2
Is there any evidence that he knows cursive? Renew Deal Tuesday #4
An obvious question mark is... ._. Tuesday #5
I know about that one cally Tuesday #6
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #7
What a joke. That's dated Nov 2025, and it states very clearly Nixie Tuesday #8
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #9
His story is very inspiring. I got a flyer from Steyer's campaign and Nixie Tuesday #12
Meaning it remains unanswered for all this time. ._. Tuesday #10
Thoughtful voters would read the article and see that he Nixie Tuesday #11
Then his efforts failed. It's really that simple. ._. Tuesday #13
Try not to conflate lower standards and different standards. Two separate concepts. Torchlight Tuesday #14
He has responsibility in this. To say otherwise is to hold a lower standard.. ._. Tuesday #15
Just a quick Google shows that the Politico article is lacking Nixie Tuesday #16
What's the first thing you'd point out from your post, that wasn't in the article? ._. Tuesday #17
You should read the case summary. The politico article Nixie Tuesday #18
Let me ask you something. ._. Tuesday #19
It's also not against the law to delegate to staff. I actually read what he instructed his staff to find about Nixie Tuesday #21
It was more than "a few thousand" and I'd hope you would know that. ._. Wednesday #22
If you read the article, you would not misrepresent what the amount was. Go back and read it again. The monthly Nixie Wednesday #23
It was 3x the going rate. THREE times. And the amount removed was $10,000 per month. ._. Wednesday #24
It was $7,500 initially, which is a few thousand a month. Nixie Wednesday #25
$10,000 was taken each month, with $7500 of that claimed as maintenance and... ._. Wednesday #27
That's good you now take Becerra's word since your insinuations that Becerra somehow knew and allowed his Nixie Thursday #30
You say you've found "plenty" about this situation. ._. Yesterday #31
Again, very simple Google searches of actual case documents Nixie Yesterday #32
If you don't know, just say so. ._. Yesterday #33
Such irony. Nixie 19 hrs ago #34
If Becerra approved the expense without ever looking at the written examples (if they exist), ._. 5 hrs ago #35
In your uninformed opinion and your own personal extrapolations. Nixie 2 hrs ago #36
Disregarding that benchmark in such a way is what's unethical. ._. 24 min ago #37
Now look at your agenda. Thanks for the reveal. Nixie 15 min ago #38
I just saw a poll today that both repubs lead in the race tishaLA Tuesday #20
I don't know of any scandals. He has my vote. LoisB Wednesday #26
Resident for 40+ years... WarGamer Wednesday #28
Interesting cally Thursday #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CA: I think I will vote...»Reply #36