Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(14,002 posts)
91. If they have no interest in discriminating or reshaping law in accord with their beliefs, they aren't violating...
Thu May 28, 2026, 12:04 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu May 28, 2026, 02:09 PM - Edit history (6)

... fundamental principles.

They have a right to their twisted interpretations, so long as they understand trying to control others by enforcing conduct that comports with those personal religious beliefs or personal discriminatory hatreds violates the fundamental moral principles that are the bedrock of the constitution and our body of law as it has evolved as we travel the road to a more perfect union.

If they do not understand this, they are Christian Nationalists, not Christians.

In America, your beliefs are yours, however repugnant. It is when you start thinking it is your job to discriminate based on those beliefs, pass legislation to force others to act in accord with personal religious beliefs, or otherwise use the levers of governmental power to make those beliefs enforceable as public policy that you cross into "no f-ing way, not in America" territory.

A person can stand in the middle of the public square spouting about aliens or how white people are being replaced. I might wish such people didn't exist, but we must tolerate them. It is when they demand a rollback of DEI to purge institutions of non-whites, or try to control what others read, who they love, or whether they choose to have a child that the red line is crossed.

It is fact that white-supremacists, people who hate those who do no confirm to a gender binary, and Christian Nationalists exist that demands stringent protections against discriminatory acts or influence in public policy, including counter-forces, like DEI.

It is not our job to purge all repugnant beliefs from the minds of Americans. For the good of civil society, we can certainly strive to instill moral principles grounded in compassion, but the most important job is to hold the line and make it crystal clear that in America, we will NOT tolerate ANYONE seeking to pass laws that force their PERSONAL religious or discriminatory beliefs on others who do not share those beliefs. It is not just deeply Un-American, it is deeply Un-Christian. Christianity is about FAITH not CONTROL. CONTROL is the OPPOSITE of FAITH.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes! leftieNanner Wednesday #1
Yes, he must do many things at once senseandsensibility Wednesday #3
It's a big ask of anyone peggysue2 Wednesday #41
Kick dalton99a Wednesday #2
It is also important he confronts MAGA christianity about their bastardization of Christianity. travelingthrulife Wednesday #4
I'm not particularly religious so maybe I'm not a good judge senseandsensibility Wednesday #5
Agreed. I am not religious either. His voice is important. travelingthrulife Thursday #87
The distinction is between Christian Nationalism and Christianity. pat_k Wednesday #30
That is a must-see for clarity. Festivito Wednesday #65
That sermon put him on my radar at the end of 2023. pat_k Wednesday #67
They aren't all Christian Nationalists though, many just have a really hateful interpretation travelingthrulife Thursday #88
If they have no interest in discriminating or reshaping law in accord with their beliefs, they aren't violating... pat_k Thursday #91
Christian nationalism is part of the Christopretensism phenomenon Jose Flavio Sanchez Yesterday #97
Spot On! pat_k Yesterday #100
My thoughts exactly. That's why I've thought that Talarico was particularly needed at this time. summer_in_TX Wednesday #42
This is great. I want to share with my fundie Trump lovers in my family. But its way too small to read for them LiberalLovinLug Thursday #94
Here's a larger image. summer_in_TX Thursday #95
Defend democracy from christopretendocracy Jose Flavio Sanchez Yesterday #98
True Jose Flavio Sanchez Yesterday #99
Trump needed no defining leftstreet Wednesday #6
Magas are and were a lost cause senseandsensibility Wednesday #7
No. "MAGA" is mainly about 30 million Bluetus Wednesday #11
Good points senseandsensibility Wednesday #12
I would say Obama was elected to bring us a public option in healthcare questionseverything Wednesday #22
But he hedged so much about it that he had no mandate. Bluetus Wednesday #33
That's not true Mad_Machine76 Wednesday #50
That is not my recollection Bluetus Wednesday #58
Here's a link from Wikipedia that appears to support my recollection of events Mad_Machine76 Wednesday #59
I don't deny that Lieberman screwed the pooch Bluetus Wednesday #62
I believe, however, that it was near the end of the passage of the ACA Mad_Machine76 Wednesday #64
I am sure the truth lies somewhere in that region. Politics can be very ugly Bluetus Wednesday #66
Disagree questionseverything Wednesday #61
I still genuinely believe if the Dems had RAMMED Medicare for all Americans through in 2009, we never PatrickforB Wednesday #36
The biggest problem is that we pay into Medicare throughout our spooky3 Wednesday #72
Nah, with all due respect, your post would have us all dancing at the end of the same string. PatrickforB Thursday #76
I suggest that you do some reading on the problems in our health care spooky3 Thursday #78
+1 leftstreet Wednesday #23
Not this again... lame54 Wednesday #43
+a zillion nt spooky3 Wednesday #71
Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging, betsuni Thursday #77
FDR who said... mountain grammy Thursday #84
I thought Kamala ran an excellent campaign PatSeg Wednesday #8
I remember marveling at how good Kamala was during the debates senseandsensibility Wednesday #10
I agree that gender was against her PatSeg Wednesday #52
You have to draw contrasts Bluetus Wednesday #35
Except I would get rid of the 'fight hard' clause. My email box and mobile text fills up every day with dozens PatrickforB Wednesday #40
Good point. Bluetus Wednesday #56
Sorry for,having to say this, but.... reACTIONary Wednesday #70
Maybe not the best strategy SomedayKindaLove Thursday #79
Step one for Congress is heal thyself (insider trading is legal?!) Soul_of_Wit Wednesday #48
Yes, as long as the examples are totally legitimate PatSeg Wednesday #55
IDK Lemon Lyman Wednesday #9
They needed to speak more about what what people needed wnylib Wednesday #24
Picking a convicted felon over competency is entirely because of not solving issues like housing and affordability (n/m) Soul_of_Wit Wednesday #49
There's a bit more to it. wnylib Wednesday #54
Here is exactly what I was talking about. wnylib Wednesday #63
do not forget the double standard Skittles Wednesday #13
Yes, in many ways that is the elephant in the room senseandsensibility Wednesday #14
she always had to avoid looking like the "angry black woman" Skittles Wednesday #17
It is a fact. Do we want to have our principles or do we want to win some elections so we can make these things right? Bluetus Wednesday #38
The one (principles) does not deny the other (victory) Torchlight Wednesday #47
It has so far. Bluetus Wednesday #57
Three key failures that were incredibly frustrating to watch. pat_k Wednesday #15
Kamala's problem was she was a woman. Just saying, people. Joinfortmill Wednesday #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Thursday #90
Like it or not, negative ads and action works. Good for him. NNadir Wednesday #18
Kamala should have challenged TSF to a polygraph test in the debates. Rhiagel Wednesday #19
I worked for an attorney The Wizard Wednesday #34
Research on polygraphs shows they are not sufficiently reliable, eg, see spooky3 Wednesday #74
He knew his client was lying to him The Wizard Thursday #83
I understand that, but people widely believe polygraphs are spooky3 Thursday #89
Nailed it orangecrush Wednesday #20
The only reason Harris lost is that she isn't a white male. ananda Wednesday #21
Thank you. /nt spudspud Wednesday #26
Yeah. I can hear the complaints from the always anti-Democrat morons: Zelda_Orchid Wednesday #27
Running for the Senate MineralMan Wednesday #25
He is also being a white male... displacedvermoter Wednesday #28
Every Democrat running for office needs to blast the republicOn party KS Toronado Wednesday #29
Can we please not do this? Politicub Wednesday #31
In LBJ's first run for Congress he The Wizard Wednesday #32
Wow senseandsensibility Wednesday #37
More corrupt than Trump? lame54 Wednesday #39
You don't define an opponent with a single interview. RandySF Wednesday #44
I am not sure one can ever define an opponent especially one as creepy as his. Best to just constantly define yourself. efhmc Wednesday #73
what she absolutely did not do that cost her votes yobrault1 Wednesday #45
Democrats need to be better at multitasking Soul_of_Wit Wednesday #46
The DNC could learn something from this guy gay texan Wednesday #51
Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find. ificandream Wednesday #53
I see.... sheshe2 Wednesday #60
Ummm... Unca Jim Wednesday #68
She called Trump an "unhinged and unstable" fascist ... oh wait, it's Kamala the Invisible, like all the betsuni Wednesday #69
Lawrence asked a repuke style question painting Rep Talarico with the pro trans kids brush. Tbear Wednesday #75
What? He isn't a Black woman? ananda Thursday #80
Its called branding Historic NY Thursday #81
I don't know, in those debates she pasted Trump pretty good bucolic_frolic Thursday #82
You have a point, especially after 45 years of incessant smearing of liberals lostnfound Thursday #85
Also bring up every time Old Crank Thursday #86
K&R red dog 1 Thursday #92
Ay, ay, ay, que rico Talarico Miami Blue Thursday #93
He's got the ads directed at Hispanics................ Lovie777 Yesterday #101
"the most corrupt politician in America" Danascot Yesterday #96
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I see that James Talarico...»Reply #91