General Discussion

The rulings have been done with an agenda. If you look at the debates at the time of the ratification of the Constitution and the first ten Amendments to it, as well as the Federalist Papers, Federalist Society judges at all levels, especially at the Appeals Courts and SCOTUS, have made rulings inconsistent with the clear meaning of our founding documents and history. Yet they wrap decisions in this fiction of originalism. Those who aren't historians might easily take that at face value.

When we get through this, we should ban any appointments to any position as a judge for anyone who is a member of the Federalist Society on the basis of treasonous manipulation of the judiciary in unconstitutional ways.

If they can't use it as a springboard for their career, it will become very weak. Sure, some will continue to believe and advocate for the positions of the Federalist Society. It's their right under the 1st Amendment. But it would become a paper tiger.