Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Well I feel rather vindicated... I said the algae problem is likely related to nutrient excess in the water [View all]
that was recovered from the Potomac..cuz you can't grow any plant without nurtrients.
Turns out the genus of algae in the relecting pool is Scenedesmus. snd that it is considered a bio-indicator species of eutrophic (nutrient overloaded) water systems
How about that... a PHD in ecological modelling rom 1988 isn't completely redundant at this point
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well I feel rather vindicated... I said the algae problem is likely related to nutrient excess in the water [View all]
31j20b3
Tuesday
OP
If the water was pumped directly from the Potomac, no wonder it has an algae problem.
waterwatcher123
Tuesday
#7
It's not pumped directly from the Potomac. The Potomac water goes through a treatment facility first
chia
Tuesday
#9
So, are you saying the water is treated to Safe Drinking Water Act standards?
waterwatcher123
Tuesday
#18
why not use tap water and chlorine, like my 60 yr old swim pool that's never had algae
msongs
Tuesday
#8
The NY Times says the pool was filled with D.C. municipal water treated with phosphate, which feeds algae.
highplainsdem
Tuesday
#13
I just posted what the NYT reported today. I don't know who has the correct information, or if any info
highplainsdem
Tuesday
#26