Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dalton99a

(96,540 posts)

2. 6-3

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:42 AM

Jun 30

ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, and JACKSON, JJ., joined. JACKSON, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which SOTOMAYOR, J., joined as to the introduction and Part I. KAVANAUGH, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined. ALITO, J., and GORSUCH, J., filed dissenting opinions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

lostincalifornia paleotn

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

***NOW*** SCOTUS UPHOLDS BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP [View all] DemocratSinceBirth Jun 30 OP

I would like to know what the three nazis on the court ruled, of course I am lostincalifornia Jun 30 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Jun 30 #3

Looks like 6-3 Renew Deal Jun 30 #4

I seem to remember it was thought Gorsuch's pro-American Indian questioning at the time muriel_volestrangler Jun 30 #6

He prides himself on being a conservative's conservative. Final tally 5 to 4. nt allegorical oracle Jun 30 #7

How do you get to 5-4? Renew Deal Jun 30 #12

6-3. Kavanaugh wrote a separate concurrence. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 30 #15

Thanks. And we all know who the two were. lostincalifornia Jun 30 #5

6-3 dalton99a Jun 30 #2

Take two. Give back one. Wonder Why Jun 30 #8

This will still go down as the worst SCOTUS in the last 100 years, at least. Martin Eden Jun 30 #9

Uh, you know this was a good decision, right? NoRethugFriends Jun 30 #10

Yes. Why do you ask? Martin Eden Jun 30 #11

Got it. Sorry for not reading carefully enough NoRethugFriends Jun 30 #13

Good decision, but sad that it wasn't 9-0. JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 30 #16

Worst since the Taney court Wednesdays Jun 30 #17

It's a conservative dream. Kablooie Jun 30 #18

"Conservative" means rightwing authoritarian Martin Eden Jun 30 #19

About time they got one correct - should've been unanimous. nt TBF Jun 30 #14