Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ohh That's Rich - birthright citizenship 6-3 to 5-4 ruling explained [View all]DemocracyForever
(415 posts)38. NAACP Legal Defense Fund chair disagrees with you
I saw NAACP Legal defense fund chaIr Janai Nelson interviewed yesterday by Jacob Soboroff on MSNow and she said what Kavanaugh was suggesting is unlawful. Again, your tongue twisting on this totally misses the mark.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They can always pass a law to give the Supreme Court another shot to get it "right".
Ilikepurple
Jul 1
#8
I never said reconsider the case. An actual law could be rightly challenged and reach the Supreme Court.
Ilikepurple
Thursday
#14
This is still just an opinion and one that doesn't carry the force of law if the Supreme Court decides otherwise.
Ilikepurple
Friday
#25
Four of the people who we have charged with deciding what the constitution means disagree with you.
Ms. Toad
Friday
#23
That still does not support your contention that he doesn't understand the Constitution.
Ms. Toad
20 hrs ago
#45
As I explained, there are two sources of citizenship: the constitution and statute.
Ms. Toad
2 hrs ago
#47